Association Between EEG Microarousal During Nocturnal Sleep and Next-Day Selective Attention in Mild Sleep-Restricted Healthy Undergraduates

Diguo Zhai,Qingwei Chen,Ying Yao,Taotao Ru,Guofu Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/nss.s442007
2024-03-29
Nature and Science of Sleep
Abstract:Diguo Zhai, 1, 2 Qingwei Chen, 1, 2 Ying Yao, 3 Taotao Ru, 1, 2 Guofu Zhou 1, 2 1 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information Materials and Technology, Institute of Electronic Paper Displays, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, People's Republic of China; 2 National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, People's Republic of China; 3 Anhui Provincial Library, Hefei, 230000, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Taotao Ru; Qingwei Chen, Lab of Light and Physio-Psychological Health-National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics-South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics-South China Normal University, No. 55, West Zhongshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 15603063417 ; +86 15521094813, Email ; Purpose: To explore whether sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) microarousals of different standard durations predict daytime mood and attention performance in healthy individuals after mild sleep restriction. Participants and Methods: Sixteen (nine female) healthy college students were recruited to examine the correlations between nocturnal EEG microarousals of different standard durations (≥ 3 s, ≥ 5 s, ≥ 7 s, ≥ 9 s) under mild sleep restriction (1.5 h) and the following morning's subjective alertness, mood, sustained attention, and selective attention task performance. Results: Results revealed that mild sleep restriction significantly reduced subjective alertness and positive mood, while having no significant effect on negative mood, sustained attention and selective attention performance. The number of microarousals (≥ 5 s) was negatively associated with positive mood at 6:30. The number of microarousals was significantly and positively correlated with the response time difference value of disengagement component of the selective attention task at around 7:30 (≥ 5 s and ≥ 7 s) and 9:00 (≥ 5 s). The number of microarousals (≥ 7 s) was significantly and positively correlated with the inaccuracy difference value of orientation component of the selective attention task at around 9:00. Conclusion: The number of EEG microarousals during sleep in healthy adults with mild sleep restriction was significantly and negatively related to their daytime positive affect while positively associated with the deterioration of disengagement and orientation of selective attention performance, but this link is dependent on the standard duration of microarousals, test time and the type of task. Keywords: microarousal, alertness, sustained attention, selective attention, sleep restriction Microarousals refer to the events of electroencephalogram (EEG) frequency change lasting more than 3 s during sleep, including theta waves and brain waves with a frequency >16 Hz (excluding spindle waves). 1 As a transient arousal event that occurs during sleep, a microarousal is not strong enough to awaken people from sleep. 2 Microarousals can be generated directly by sensory input disturbances during sleep, such as blood pressure/heart rate changes and environmental noise. 3 Excessive microarousals would cause sleep fragmentation, which would lead to the similar undesirable effects caused by sleep deprivation/sleep restriction, such as emotion deregulation, 4 cognitive dysfunction 5 and social withdrawal. 6 Moreover, excessive microarousals is one of the core characteristics of some neurological disorders (such as depression) 7,8 and breath-related problems (ie, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA)). 9,10 Thus, systematic investigations about microarousals are of vital role both theoretically and practically. The minimum duration criteria for a microarousal has been under debated until now. Although the 3 s minimum duration criteria for a microarousal was acknowledged by the American Sleep Disorders Association in 1992, 1 this short-duration criteria was criticized by its poor inter-scorer reliability. 11,12 Some scholars thus proposed that longer duration instead of the standard 3 s duration criteria might be better to characterize a microarousal and have improved clinical utility in assessing cognitive impairment in OSA patients. For instance, Schwartz and Moxley 13 found that "long microarousals" (15 s to 60 s in duration) were better correlated with subjective sleepiness than "short microarousals" (3 s to 15 s in duration) did in OSA patients. A more recent study also confirmed this finding and revealed that compared to -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?