MAP2K1 Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Predict Poor Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy and to Vertical Targeting of MAPK Pathway

Jeremy Chuang,Chongkai Wang,Yuming Guo,Valerie Valenzuela,Jun Wu,Marwan Fakih
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2020.12.003
IF: 4.035
2021-03-01
Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p><em>MAP2K1</em> mutations<em>,</em> otherwise known as <em>MEK</em> mutations, are rare oncogenic alterations that have been implicated in <em>MAPK</em> pathway activation. The impact of <em>MAP2K1</em> mutations in colorectal cancer on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody response has not been characterized.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Antitumor activity was assessed in mouse xenograft models with SW48 cell lines harboring <em>MAP2K1</em> mutation and protein expression of <em>RAS</em> signaling pathway was studied by western blot analysis. We retrospectively identified patients with <em>MAP2K1</em>-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated at City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2015 and 2020 using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients' tumor characteristics, treatment response, and outcome are described. Additional patients with the <em>MAP2K1</em> mutation were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) oncogenomic database.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models demonstrated efficacy with combination therapy with EGFR and MEK inhibition with either BRAF or ERK inhibitors. Five patients treated at City of Hope between 2015 and 2020 harbored a <em>MAP2K1</em> mutation at a frequency of 1%. <em>APC</em> and <em>TP53</em> were common co-alterations. All patients were <em>RAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> wild-type except one case that harbored a concurrent <em>KRAS</em> mutation. Four <em>RAS/BRAF</em> wild-type <em>MAP2K1</em> mutated patients was treated with anti-EGFR, anti-EGFR + MEK and BRAF inhibitors, and anti-EGFR + ERK inhibitors. All 4 patients experienced disease progression.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p><em>MAP2K1</em> mutation in colorectal cancer are associated with poor response to EGFR inhibition. EGFR inhibition with or without MEK, BRAF, or ERK inhibitors did not result in any clinical benefits in our limited experience.</p>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?