Abstract:For injured patients, receiving the right care at the right time and right place is a laudable and impactful goal but one that arguably remains largely aspirational for many who are injured far from a hospital with the greatest specialization in care of the injured, a level 1 trauma center. Triage—or sorting of patients to match their needs with the resources and capabilities of clinicians—both during the prehospital phase (ie, primary triage) and after initial in-hospital evaluation (ie, transfer from one hospital to another [secondary triage]) is an inherently imperfect process. Triaging patients who could have received appropriate care at less capable hospitals to highly capable ones, or "overtriage," wastes resources and potentially overburdens highly capable hospitals such that outcomes in general might worsen if the high patient volume cannot be managed well, 1 but triaging patients to hospitals with insufficient capabilities to meet patient needs, or "undertriage," is clearly associated with inadequate or at least delayed care. This balance of the risks of secondary overtriage and undertriage is the context underlying the study by Tillmann and colleagues, 2 who evaluate the health care costs associated with the transfer of patients with minor injuries from nontrauma centers to trauma centers in Ontario, Canada. The authors marshalled several data sources to examine total health care costs within 30 days after minor injuries (defined as survival >24 hours, Injury Severity Score <16, and none of a predetermined set of critical injuries) among adult patients who presented to a nontrauma center, comparing costs among 12 652 patients who were transferred to a trauma center with those among 22 029 similar patients who remained hospitalized at the nontrauma center. Costs among transferred patients were a modest 6.5% (95% CI, 4.4%-8.5%) higher than those among nontransferred patients, and 44.9% of transferred patients were discharged from the trauma center emergency department. As the authors describe, we know from prior studies that the costs of care are higher at trauma centers than nontrauma hospitals. For severely injured patients, trauma centers provide superior care that most would consider worth the extra cost, but patients with minor injuries do not so clearly benefit. Is the transfer of patients with minor injuries, specifically, who, in aggregate, do not seem to have better outcomes at trauma centers, associated with any differences in health care costs? One could plausibly imagine any of the possibilities—decreased costs with transfer, no difference, or increased costs—each of which could have different policy implications. Transfers are dependent on the context in which they occur; some systems have robust specialist support and comfort level with treating most minor injuries, and others emphatically do not, resulting in liberal transfer thresholds. Systems also differ functionally in the reasons for transfer, with some focused on clinician judgment and others more heavily reliant on defined criteria or injuries. In addition, the costs of care in Canada—and its overarching system of payment—may not translate well to those in other countries. For example, in the hospital-centric US health care system, depending on the payer mix of the involved patients, overtriage may actually help financially sustain both referring (nontrauma) and receiving (trauma) centers. 3 For all these reasons, the authors' findings may or may not be representative of, or have the same implications in, other regions. A key challenge in any comparison of transferred vs nontransferred patients is selection bias from the inscrutable issue of what prompted the transfer. Although Tillmann et al 2 attempted to account for differences between transferred and nontransferred patients with propensity score matching, almost certainly there is some degree of residual confounding that was not captured—details about the anatomic nature of injuries (fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, or intra-abdominal injury), physiologic derangement, comorbidities, or patient preferences—that might be associated with both the likelihood of transfer and increased costs. The concept of overtriage itself rests on a vague definition. It is challenging retrospectively, let alone prospectively, to assess which patients with minor injuries truly warranted transfer. "Minor injury" (ie, the lack of a major injury) includes some characteristics that are unknowable at the time of triage and merely represents a construct that the care probably could have been provided at any hospital. However, even minor injuries sometimes require expertise unavailable at nontrauma centers, and—although the authors observed virtually no differences in hospital disposition (eAppendix 3, eTable 8 in their Supplement 1)—transfer may have improved outcomes, even if only for function, quality -Abstract Truncated-

Survival of the fastest? A descriptive analysis of severely injured trauma patients primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers in a Danish inclusive trauma system

Trauma systems and early management of severe injuries in Scandinavia: review of the current state

Clinical characteristics and mortality risk factors among trauma patients by age groups at a single center in Korea over 7 years: a retrospective study

An analysis of missed injuries in patients with severe trauma

Patients suffering traumatic brain injury: patient characteristics, prehospital triage, primary referral and mortality - A population-based follow-up study

International benchmarking of tertiary trauma centers: productivity and throughput approach

Trauma team activation and triage of severely injured patients at one non-trauma-center hospital in Stockholm

[Care Management for Polytrauma Patients in a Level-1 Trauma Centre]

Care pathways and factors associated with interhospital transfer to neurotrauma centers for patients with isolated moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a population-based study from the Norwegian trauma registry

The non-conveyance of trauma patients in Swedish emergency medical services: a retrospective observational study of the trauma population not transported to an emergency department

Accuracy and influencing factors of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for adult trauma patients at a level-1 trauma center in Korea

Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Trauma Secondary Overtriage and Cost

The accuracy of prehospital triage decisions in English trauma networks – a case-cohort study

A trauma expert consensus: Capabilities are required early to improve survivability from traumatic injury

A multi-dimensional approach to identifying high performing trauma centers across the United States

Incidence, severity and changes of abnormal vital signs in trauma patients: A national population-based analysis

Mortality of Critically Ill Trauma Patients Before and After Setting Up of a Dedicated Trauma Centre in a Tertiary Hospital of Eastern India

Statement of severe trauma management in France; teachings of the FIRST study

Survival among patients with severe high cervical spine injuries - a TraumaRegister DGU® database study

Analysis of Risk Factors in Thoracic Trauma Patients with a Comparison of a Modern Trauma Centre: a Mono-Centre Study.