A “Dry Tap” in Prosthetic Joint Infection Work-Up of Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Reassuring

Emily A Treu,Nathan F Behrens,Brenna E Blackburn,Daniel M Cushman,Michael J Archibeck,Emily A. Treu,Nathan F. Behrens,Brenna E. Blackburn,Daniel M. Cushman,Michael J. Archibeck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.029
IF: 4.435
2024-02-01
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid analysis is important in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The rate of culture-positive PJI in patients who have a dry tap of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well described.METHODS: We reviewed all image-guided THA aspirations, performed from 2014 to 2021 at a single academic institution. Aspirations were categorized as successful (≥ 0.5 mL) or unsuccessful (< 0.5 mL, "dry tap"). We analyzed culture data on all repeat aspirations and revision surgeries performed within 90 days of the initial dry tap.RESULTS: We reviewed 275 consecutive attempted THA aspirations of which 100 (36.4%) resulted in a dry tap. The dry tap cohort had a significantly higher percentage of fluoroscopic-guided aspirations (64%) and fewer ultrasound-guided aspirations (36%) compared to the successful aspiration cohort (48.9% fluoroscopic, 53.1% ultrasound, P = .0061). Of the 100 patients who have dry taps, 48 underwent revision surgery within 90 days of the initial dry tap, and 15 resulted in 2 or more positive cultures. The rate of PJI defined by MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria in the dry tap cohort was 16.0%.CONCLUSIONS: Attempted aspiration of a THA resulted in a dry tap 36.4% of the time. Of those patients who had a dry tap, 16.0% were subsequently found to have PJI based on MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria. Therefore, a "dry tap" does not exclude the diagnosis of infection and should not be considered reassuring for the absence of PJI.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?