Development and validation of MRI‐based deep learning models for prediction of microsatellite instability in rectal cancer

Wei Zhang,Hongkun Yin,Zixing Huang,Jian Zhao,Haoyu Zheng,Du He,Mou Li,Weixiong Tan,Song Tian,Bin Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3957
IF: 4.711
2021-05-08
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Microsatellite instability (MSI) predetermines responses to adjuvant 5‐fluorouracil and immunotherapy in rectal cancer and serves as a prognostic biomarker for clinical outcomes. Our objective was to develop and validate a deep learning model that could preoperatively predict the MSI status of rectal cancer based on magnetic resonance images.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>This single‐center retrospective study included 491 rectal cancer patients with pathologically proven microsatellite status. Patients were randomly divided into the training/validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 395) and the testing cohort (<i>n</i> = 96). A clinical model using logistic regression was constructed to discriminate MSI status using only clinical factors. Based on a modified MobileNetV2 architecture, deep learning models were tested for the predictive ability of MSI status from magnetic resonance images, with or without integrating clinical factors. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The clinical model correctly classified 37.5% of MSI status in the testing cohort, with an AUC value of 0.573 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.468 ~ 0.674). The pure imaging‐based model and the combined model correctly classified 75.0% and 85.4% of MSI status in the testing cohort, with AUC values of 0.820 (95% CI, 0.718 ~ 0.884) and 0.868 (95% CI, 0.784 ~ 0.929), respectively. Both deep learning models performed better than the clinical model (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the deep learning models with or without integrating clinical factors. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Deep learning based on high‐resolution T2‐weighted magnetic resonance images showed a good predictive performance for MSI status in rectal cancer patients. The proposed model may help to identify patients who would benefit from chemotherapy or immunotherapy and determine individualized therapeutic strategies for these patients.</p></section>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?