Abstract:China is in the process of establishing a national emissions trading system (ETS). Evaluating the implementation effectiveness of the seven pilot ETSs in China is critical for designing this national system. This study administered a questionnaire survey to assess the behaviour of enterprises covered by the seven ETS pilots from the perspective of: the strictness of compliance measures; rules for monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV); the mitigation pressure felt by enterprises; and actual mitigation and trading activities. The results show that the pilot MRV and compliance rules have not yet been fully implemented. The main factors involved are the lack of compulsory force of the regulations and the lack of policy awareness within the affected enterprises. Most enterprises have a shortage of free allowances and thus believe that the ETSs have increased their production costs. Most enterprises have already established mitigation targets. Some of the covered enterprises are aware of their own internal emission reduction costs and most of these have used this as an important reference in trading. Many enterprises have accounted for carbon prices in their long-term investment. The proportion of enterprises that have participated in trading is fairly high; however, reluctance to sell is quite pervasive in the market, and enterprises are mostly motivated to trade simply in order to achieve compliance. Few enterprises are willing to manage their allowances in a market-oriented manner. Different free allowance allocation methods directly affect the pathways enterprises take to control emissions. Key policy insights In the national ETS, the compulsory force of ETS provisions should be strengthened.A reasonable level of free allowance shortage should be ensured to promote emission reduction by enterprises.Sufficient information should be provided to guide enterprises in their allowance management to activate the market.To promote the implementation of mitigation technologies by enterprises, actual output-based allocation methods should be used.The government should use market adjustment mechanisms, such as a price floor and ceiling, to ensure that carbon prices are reasonable and stable, so as to guide long-term low carbon investment. In the national ETS, the compulsory force of ETS provisions should be strengthened. A reasonable level of free allowance shortage should be ensured to promote emission reduction by enterprises. Sufficient information should be provided to guide enterprises in their allowance management to activate the market. To promote the implementation of mitigation technologies by enterprises, actual output-based allocation methods should be used. The government should use market adjustment mechanisms, such as a price floor and ceiling, to ensure that carbon prices are reasonable and stable, so as to guide long-term low carbon investment.

Can the pilot emission trading system coordinate the relationship between emission reduction and economic development goals in China?

Can China's carbon emissions trading scheme achieve a double dividend?

Environmental and economic performance of China’s ETS pilots: New evidence from an expanded synthetic control method

Has China’s Emission Trading System Achieved the Development of a Low-Carbon Economy in High-Emission Industrial Subsectors?

Has China's pilot emission trading system promoted technological progress in industrial subsectors?

Shooting two hawks with one arrow: Could China's emission trading scheme promote green development efficiency and regional carbon equality?

Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China’s Eight ETS Pilots

Analysis on the Emission Reduction Effect of China's Carbon Trading Policy—Research on pilot policies based on carbon emissions trading

Addressing Climate Change Through a Market Mechanism: a Comparative Study of the Pilot Emission Trading Schemes in China

Have China’s pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions?– The evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level

Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China

Emissions Trading in China: Progress and Prospects

Does emission trading system achieve the win-win of carbon emission reduction and financial performance improvement? —Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms in industrial sector

The energy conservation and emission reduction co-benefits of China's emission trading system

Environmental and economic effects of China’s carbon market pilots: Empirical evidence based on a DID model

Has China’s Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Influenced the Carbon Intensity of Output?

Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China

Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China

Can carbon emission trading pilot facilitate green development performance? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Effect Analysis of China's Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy on Carbon Emission Control

Assessment of the Performance of Pilot Carbon Emissions Trading Systems in China