Abstract:Across the global evidence ecosystem, numerous organizations share a common vision and mission: to promote evidence‐based decision making worldwide. These organizations, including JBI, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the Campbell Collaboration, have each made an indelible imprint on the evidence‐based movement and have been identified as, "a crucial mechanism to facilitate the synthesis, transfer, and implementation of evidence into health care policy and practice."[[1], p.211] While the benefits of global collaboration have been well established for some time, achieving impact at scale will require a fundamental shift in mindset. The COVID‐19 pandemic marked a turning point for evidence‐based health care and decision making. It provided a unique context whereby policymakers, healthcare providers, researchers, and the public required immediate access to trustworthy evidence to make decisions. We collectively faced major challenges in translating a rapidly evolving body of new evidence into tangible response efforts, with health policy decisions receiving unprecedented public attention. The 'stress test' of COVID‐19, and the many postpandemic initiatives that followed, highlighted the need for more effective strategies, institutional mechanisms, and capacities to systematically mobilize and contextualize the best available evidence for rapid decision‐making for effective and equitable public health responses.[2, 3, 4] Each of our organizations responded to COVID‐19 in different ways and were able to provide access to reliable evidence. Yet it is essential to acknowledge the challenges of sustaining funding, upholding methodological rigour, and ensuring diversity and inclusivity in our collective endeavours. Our demonstrated success in enhancing global health care, education, and social policy underscores the value of collaborative, evidence‐based approaches in addressing the world's most pressing challenges. We find ourselves at a unique juncture where our respective global collaborative evidence networks (JBI, Cochrane, and Campbell) must reimagine the way we work together to facilitate and engage in multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and interdisciplinary research, dissemination, knowledge sharing and knowledge translation to generate impact at scale across the evidence ecosystem. It is time to develop interagency collaboration as a coherent programme rather than a series of standalone efforts. There is significant potential in our ability to orchestrate, integrate, co‐ordinate, and align our activities to identify opportunities for mutual benefit, learning, and impact. A call to action . One of the most significant benefits of our respective global networks is our capacity to transcend geographical boundaries. By facilitating better global interagency collaboration, we enable the pooling of expertise and knowledge in the field of evidence‐based practice, and the result is a more holistic and nuanced understanding of complex issues, leading to improved decision making at both local and global levels. Examples of this may include much deeper collaboration on methodologies and standards for synthesis that reflect the diversity of evidence to respond to global challenges; a more co‐ordinated approach to the prioritization of synthesis efforts to avoid duplication of effort; and better, more meaningful partnership on the contextualization or localization of evidence for policy and practice. Going forward, it is incumbent upon us to support and strengthen our networks and the relationships between them, recognizing the invaluable contributions we can collectively make to improving the well‐being of individuals and communities around the world. The path to a brighter, more evidence‐based future lies in continued collaboration and our unwavering commitment to the delivery of trustworthy evidence. Collaboration across our global networks, not just within them, is now not merely a choice but a necessity in our increasingly interconnected world.

Empowering optometrists with evidence: The American Academy of Optometry and Cochrane Eyes and Vision Educational Program

Evidence-based clinical practice, [corrected] evidence-based medicine and the Cochrane collaboration

How to achieve universal coverage of cataract surgical services in developing countries: lessons from systematic reviews of other services

Toward Universal Eye Health Coverage-Key Outcomes of the World Health Organization Package of Eye Care Interventions: A Systematic Review

Mapping Research Trends of Chronic Ocular Graft-Versus-host Disease from 2009 to 2020: a Bibliometric Analysis

Research trends of worldwide ophthalmologic randomized controlled trials in the 21st century: A bibliometric study

Illuminating Perspectives: Navigating Eye Care Access in Sub-Saharan Africa Through the Social Determinants of Health

Exploring barriers and facilitators, and their effectiveness in eye health promotion interventions: Protocol of a systematic review

The Role of Optometry in the Delivery of Eye Care via Telehealth: A Systematic Literature Review

The Study and Practice of Evidence-Based Medicine: Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Common Ocular Fundus Diseases in China

Comprehensive insights into a decade-long journey: The evolution, impact, and human factors of an asynchronous telemedicine program for diabetic retinopathy screening in Pennsylvania, United States

A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology

An international strategic plan to preserve and restore vision: four curricula of ophthalmic education

International Vision Care: Issues and Approaches

Building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative practice in eyecare: Learnings from the Queensland Paediatric Optometry Alignment Program

Clinical application of oral Chinese Patent Medicines in ophthalmology: a scoping review protocol

Scholarly Influence of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum eHealth Initiative: Review and Bibliometric Study of the 2012 to 2017 Outcomes

Unlocking the power of global collaboration: building a stronger evidence ecosystem together

Effectiveness of an innovative and comprehensive eye care model for individuals in residential care facilities: results of the residential ocular care (ROC) multicentred randomised controlled trial

Rapid survey for assessing effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC) and effective refractive error coverage (eREC)-Novel indicators of universal eye health

Keeping up with evidence a new system for WHO's evidence-based family planning guidance