Abstract:In the past five years, “sharing economy” firms like Uber, ZipCar, AirBnB and TaskRabbit have generated both huge market valuations and fierce regulatory contests in America’s cities. Incumbent firms in the taxi, hotel and other industries, as well consumer protection, labor and neighborhood activists, have pushed for regulations stifling or banning new sharing economy entrants. Sharing firms have fought back, using their popularity with consumers and novel political strategies, lobbying for freedom to operate as broadly as possible without government interference. But to date, both participants and observers of these “sharing wars” have relied on an unstated assumption: if the sharing firms win these fights, their future will be largely free from government regulation. Local governments will either shut sharing down, or they will leave it alone. But this assumption is almost surely wrong. If sharing firms prevail in the current fights over the right to operate (and indications suggest they will), it is unlikely that cities and states ignore them. Instead, as sharing economy firms move from being upstarts to important and permanent players in key urban industries like transportation, hospitality and dining, local and state governments are likely to adopt the type of mixed regulatory strategies they apply to types of firms with whom sharing firms share important traits, from property developers to incumbent taxi operators. Using tools of agglomeration economics and public choice, this Article sketches the future of such policy regimes. Specifically, local and state governments will adopt some combination of the following policies in addition to insisting on consumer/incumbent protections: (1) subsidizing sharing firms to encourage expansion of services that produce public goods, generate substantial consumer surplus and/or minimize the need for excessive regulation of the property market; (2) harnessing sharing firms as a tool for redistribution; and/or (3) contracting with sharing firms to provide traditional government services. The future of sharing economy regulation will be very different from its present, and the changes will pose profound legal, political and ethical questions for our cities.

The dark side of the sharing economy: A systematic literature review of externalities and their regulation

Sharing Economy: A Comprehensive Literature Review

The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework

Sharing Economy: Promote Its Potential to Sustainability by Regulation

Prospects and challenges of sharing economy for the public sector

The Sharing Economy and Consumer Protection Regulation: The Case for Policy Change

The Sharing Economy: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

A systematic review and future directions of the sharing economy: business models, operational insights and environment-based utilities

The implications of the sharing economy for transport

Who Benefits from the "Sharing" Economy of Airbnb?

First Principles for Regulating the Sharing Economy

The dark side of the sharing economy: Balancing value co‐creation and value co‐destruction

Roles of government in regulating the sharing economy: A case study of bike sharing in China

Sharing-Economy Ecosystem: A Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions

Like Uber, But for Local Governmental Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the 'Sharing Economy'

Sharing economy in hospitality and tourism: a review and the future pathways

The Myth of the Sharing Economy and Its Implications for Regulating Innovation

Externalities, scarcity, and abundance

Development of Regulatory Strategies in the Sharing Economy: The Application of Game Theory

Foundations of consumption and production in the sharing economy