Socrates: Fox or Hedgehog ——A Reflection on Socratic Tragedy
BAO Li-min,CAO Rui-tao
2006-01-01
Abstract:The Death of Socrates is an important event in the history of Western political philosophy. Plato has written a dialogue called Socratic Apology. There is a puzzle that anyone who has read Apology might have had from time to time. Why did Socrates not take many opportunities to compromise and so to avoid his tragedyWhy did he often challenge Athens, almost intentionally brought his own death There are, however, two ways of interpreting this event.To use Berlin’s famous analogy, one may either think Socrates’ destiny as a hedgehog’s tragedy, or think it a fox’ one. The former interpretation believes that because Socrates is too confident in insisting on an absolutist, simple and transcendent idea of value, his beliefs will be inevitably in violent conflict with the secular values of Athens’ city-state. Because Socrates thought himself fighting for the Truth, the city had to shut up him by death penalty. On the other hand, a fox will have his own kind of tragedy. The stableness of the state is based on the moral seriousness. A fox sophist is someone who is pluralistic, negative, and deconstructive. Socrates is exactly this kind of fox. Fox may be a good characteristic of a scholar, but a society must fend off this ironic spirit if it is going to maintain social solidarity. ″Philosophy″ may have two different meanings. However, the two may all become threats to politics. First, philosophy is often understood as metaphysics.Metaphysics is transcendental, and hence may threat mundane political life.On the other hand, philosophy may be regarded as ″critical spirit″,which means the spirit of fox. Its rule of morality is skeptical of everything, including metaphysics.This philosophy may threat politics more, as moral life is based on faiths. After Delphi Event, Socrates devoted all his energy into this kind of philosophical cause, criticizing other people and himself. There is one point to be stressed. We think that Plato and Socrates are basically of one mind.Plato is, unlike some modern scholars have suggested, someone who has lost his teacher’s critical spirit.If the two are of opposite minds, as those scholars have thought, why did Plato elaborates Socratic philosophy in detail and in a persuasive wayThe arguments for the enemy would lead to the jeopardy of one’s own philosophy. Our study suggests another conclusion.Socrates cannot be confined into either of these patterns.A more plausible possibility is that Socrates is both a fox and a hedgehog. The two mentalities do not conflict in Socrates, but reinforce each other. This leads to his powerful intellectual and moral caliber, and, unfortunately, leads to his death. Fortunately, Plato has realized the significance in this event.His masterful representation of Socrates has made Socratic tragedy an important foundation for the Western history of politics.