EP26.01: Prevalence of anal sphincter injuries identified using endoanal ultrasound among primipara women: a cross‐sectional analytical study

J.M. Remo,N.P. Pangilinan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29075

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 361-362, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

OC18.05: Three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter immediately after vaginal birth: an exploratory study

L. Cattani,B. Packet,A. Samešová,H. Williams,D. Van Schoubroeck,J. Deprest

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27849

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 48-48, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Underdiagnosis of internal anal sphincter trauma following vaginal delivery

B D O'Leary,L Kelly,M Fitzpatrick,D P Keane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26049

Abstract:Objective: Damage to the anal sphincter during childbirth remains the leading cause of fecal incontinence in women. Defects in the internal (IAS) or external anal sphincter, alongside symptoms and sphincter tone, will generally dictate the suggested mode of delivery in any successive pregnancy. This study aimed to examine using endoanal ultrasonography the prevalence of IAS damage in women referred with Grade-3a or -3b obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in a tertiary-referral perineal clinic. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of all women referred to a tertiary-referral perineal clinic after primary repair of OASI (Grade 3a-c, 4) diagnosed for the first time following vaginal delivery between January 2016 and December 2019, inclusive. Women were assessed using the Wexner bowel continence questionnaire, digital examination of sphincter tone and endoanal ultrasound. Injuries in each sphincter were classified as a scar (≤ 30°) or defect (> 30-90° or > 90°) on endoanal imaging in the axial plane. Results: In total, 615 women were referred following primary repair of OASI. Sonographic evidence of damage to the IAS was seen in 9.1% (46/506) of women diagnosed with a Grade-3a/3b injury. In women referred with a Grade-3a/3b tear, symptom scores were statistically higher (P = 0.025) in those with an IAS defect > 30° compared to those with an intact or scarred IAS, although the median score was zero in both groups. The proportion of women in each group with severe symptoms (score > 9) was similar (2.6% vs 6.5%; P = 0.148). Among women referred with a Grade-3a/3b tear, sphincter tone was reduced more frequently in those with a defect of the IAS than in those with an intact or scarred IAS (52.2% vs 11.7%; odds ratio, 8.14 (95% CI, 4.26-15.67); P < 0.001). Regardless of the reason for referral, women with reduced sphincter tone on rectal examination were four times as likely to have had an IAS defect > 30° than were those with normal resting tone (risk ratio, 4.58 (95% CI, 3.25-6.45); P < 0.001). Conclusions: One in 11 women diagnosed with a Grade-3a or -3b tear have evidence of damage to their IAS on endoanal ultrasound. Damage to this muscle is linked to fecal incontinence in women and can have a significant impact on the planning of any future deliveries. This study highlights the importance of established perineal clinics with access to ultrasound. Nonetheless, if reduced sphincter tone is felt on rectal examination, a clinician should have a high index of suspicion for an occult IAS injury. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
OP14.06: A preliminary study on the measurement of anal sphincter in healthy adult women by transluminal dual plane shear wave elastography

L. Yang,L. Zhou,H. Zhuang,Y. Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27989

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 97-97, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury After Episiometer-Guided Versus Conventional Episiotomy in Instrumental Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Soundarya N Sriram,Gowri Dorairajan,Ajay Rane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05917-x

2024-09-10

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesis: Guidelines recommend episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery with an optimal incision angle of 60° to protect the anal sphincter. The "Episiometer" is a new device promising a 60° incision angle. We compared the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and post-repair suture angle of episiotomies made with conventional "eyeballing" versus Episiometer guided during instrumental delivery. Methods: We conducted this randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care teaching institute in southern India after ethical committee approval, trial registration, and informed consent. We randomized (block) 328 pregnant women aged 18 years and above with term, singleton fetuses delivered by instruments into Episiometer-guided (164) or conventional episiotomy (164) groups (allocation concealed). We compared the OASI (identified clinically) and the suture angle measured from the midline (assessor blinded) in the two groups. We followed up on the subjects at 6 and 12 weeks to assess perineal pain and fecal/flatus incontinence. Results: The incidence of OASI of 0.61% in the Episiometer group was significantly lower compared with 4.88% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 5.6; p = 0.02; adjusted risk ratio = 5.9; CI 0.7-46.1; p = 0.09). A significantly higher proportion of subjects (59.1%) in the Episometer group had a post-suture angle between 36 and 40° compared with 36.6% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 21.8, p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the perineal pain or Wexner score during follow-up. Conclusion: The Episiometer-guided episiotomy during instrumental delivery resulted in a significantly higher suture angle and lower obstetric anal sphincter injuries than with conventional eyeballing.
EP19.21: The use of vaginal probe transperineal as screening tool of occult perineal tear in postpartum women

S. Putri,N. Bernolian,R. Krisna,T. Theodorus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28804

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 301-301, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Incidence and Risk Factors for Secondary Failure after Acute Obstetric Sphincter Injury Repair – an Audit of 239 Women

Anshini Jain,Chen Lew,Kaushik Thungathruthi,Suat Chin Ng,Richard Hiscock,Naseem Mirbagheri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16313

IF: 3.4

2022-08-29

Colorectal Disease

Abstract:Aim: The rate of secondary failure after obstetric sphincter injury repair is unknown, with the literature reporting rates ranging from 0.1‐53%. We aimed to perform an audit to identify the rate and risk factors for sphincter repair failure in a cohort of postpartum women using endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and manometry, assessing risk factors and impact of these events. Methods: Prospective data was collected within a 2‐year period of patients who attended the perineal clinic at Eastern Health. Variables of primary repair and presence of postpartum complications were recorded and subsequently analysed. Results: Of 239 obstetric acute sphincter injury (OASI) patients included, 100 (41.8%) had EUAS evidence of sphincter defects. Only 20% with secondary repair failure were symptomatic with faecal or flatal incontinence at a mean follow‐up of 23.4 months postpartum. Patients with secondary repair failure had lower anal resting (p=0.006) and maximum squeeze pressures compared to patients with intact repairs (p<0.001). In terms of variables that were investigated: location, operator hierarchy, type of repair and material used, none had a statistically significant correlation with secondary repair failure of OASI. Postpartum complications had an overall incidence of 12.7% and those with any complication were found to have an increased rate of secondary failure of repair (p=0.157). Conclusion: Using endoanal ultrasound to confirm secondary failure of repair, incidence was 41.4% in this cohort. There were no identifiable modifiable variables that reduced the risk of secondary failure of repair. Further prospective research with increased sample size and longer follow‐up periods is required to assess the validity of the findings.

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
EP26.03: Transvaginal two‐dimensional sonographic assessment for detecting levator ani muscle trauma in women after childbirth

Y. Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29077

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 362-362, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
The influence of the fundal pressure manoeuvre at delivery on the anal sphincter injury diagnosed with endoanal ultrasonography

Petra Bukovec,Blažka Šturm,Jaka Jakob Hodnik,Kristina Drusany Starič

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.04.013

Abstract:Objectives: The fundal pressure manoeuvre (FPM) is a procedure where the fundus of the uterus is pushed through the abdominal wall by the midwifes and doctors to shorten the terminal phase of the second stage vaginal delivery. Nowadays its use is controversial and associated with many adverse effects. The aim of the study was to evaluate benefits and adverse maternal outcomes after FPM. The correlation of the FPM with episiotomy was evaluated. The role of the FPM on pelvic floor dysfunction such as anal incontinence due to anal sphincter injury was assessed. Study design: The retrospective study was conducted between 2017 and 2021. The women who came to the postpartum examination to Gynaecology department for various reasons and gave vaginal birth to a singleton were included in the study. The women who had instrumental delivery were excluded. Minimal sample size was calculated with calculator.net and set on 45. Two groups were formed one with fundal pressure and one without, 96 and 90 patients respectively. The maternal, fetal, and obstetric factors that could be associated with the application of FPM were examined. The endoanal ultrasound examination was performed on all women included in the study. Results: The study did not show that FPM would lead to a more frequent occurrence of anal sphincter injury (p = 0.73), effect its location (p = 0.77) and depth (p = 0.97), however the test group tended to have longer ruptures compared to control group (p = 0.1). No statistically significant differences in episiotomies between control and test group (p = 0.075) were shown. Endoanal ultrasound showed discrepancy between clinically stated and ultrasonographical diagnoses of anal sphincter injuries. In 61,3% of patients with anal sphincter injury after FPM, reported one of the anal incontinence problems of varying degrees six months after delivery. Conclusion: Given that the study proved that FPM is not correlated to the anal sphincter injury it can be used safely. The FPM should be performed carefully and only if necessary to safely finish the labour or in combination with instrumental delivery.
Obstetric Characteristics and Functional Outcomes in Women with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

Shree Prasad Adhikari,Sandesh Poudel,Sapana Amatya Baidhya,Manisha Yadav

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.5118

2024-06-22

Abstract:Background: Obstetric anal sphincter injury is a complication of vaginal delivery, if left untreated, causes significant maternal morbidities; urinary problems and fecal/ flatus incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and describe the obstetric characteristics and functional outcomes of women who had vaginal delivery at Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital Nepal and sustained Obstetric anal sphincter injury. Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included women who had vaginal delivery, irrespective of parity, in the labor room or birthing unit of Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital from April 2018 to September 2020, and sustained Grade III or IV Obstetric anal sphincter injury after 28 weeks period of gestation. Maternal characteristics, obstetric details and perineal status after vaginal delivery were noted after review of hospital records. The patients were further inquired via telephone for their current status of fecal and/or urinary incontinence. Results: The incidence of OASI was 106 (0.33%) among 31, 786 Nepalese women with vaginal birth over a 2-year period. The mean age women with Obstetric anal sphincter injury was 24.6 ± 4.3 years and 45(52.9%) cases belonged to Janajati ethnicity. Fifty two (61.2 %) were primipara and 77 (90.6%) had spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Episiotomy was not performed on most of the patients (63, 74.1%). Problems with flatus holding, stool holding and urine holding was reported by 28.3%, 13.2% and 22.6% women respectively. Conclusions: The incidence of Obstetric anal sphincter injury among Nepalese women with vaginal birth over a 2-year period was 0.33%, which was lower than other South Asian studies. Grade III Obstetric anal sphincter injury was the frequent most type. The injuries were more common in women with Janajati ethnicity, primipara and women who did not have episiotomy. Problems with flatus holding and urine holding were present in almost one-fourth of the women with Obstetric anal sphincter injury at follow up.
Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicenter clinical study

Katarzyna Borycka,Marcel Mlynczak,Maciej Rosol,Kacper Korzeniewski,Piotr Iwanowski,Hynek Herman,Petr Janku,Malgorzata Uchman-Musielak,Erik Dosedla,Enrique Gonzalez Diaz,Iwona Sudol-Szopinska,Michal Mik,Carlo Ratto,Antonino Spinelli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.24308379

2024-06-04

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). Design: A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Setting: Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. Population: 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Methods: Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 ± 0.5%, 90.6 ± 2.0%, and 84.6 ± 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 ± 0.4%, 90.0 ± 1.2%, and 90.0 ± 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. Conclusion: The ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy appears to be a high-performance and safe method for rapid OASI detection, complementing digital rectal examination in obstetric settings. Funding: The study was financed by the Polish National Centre for Research and Development (POIR.01.01.01-00-0726/18).
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries detection by digital rectal examination and impedance spectroscopy: post-hoc analysis of the results from a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study

Stefano Salvatore,Katarzyna Borycka,Alessandro Ruffolo,Marcel Mlynczak,Maciej Rosol,Kacper Korzeniewski,Piotr Iwanowski,Antonino Spinelli,Renaud de Tayrac,Carlo Ratto,Stavros Athanasiou,Diaa Essameldin Ali Rizk,Andrea Stuart,Jan Baekelandt,Hynek Herman,Petr Janku,Peter Rosenblat,Rita Franco,Mariusz Grzesiak,Adam Dziki,Ruwan Fernando

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.18.24313868

2024-09-19

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of digital rectal examination (DRE) and machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy (ONIRY) for detecting obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) compared to three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). Design: A post-hoc analysis of data from a prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study ( ). Setting: Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Spain. Population: 152 vaginally delivered women to 8 weeks post-partum. Methods: Participants were divided into two groups based on EAUS results: Group I (no OASI, including 1st and 2nd degree perineal tears per OASIS classification) and Group II (OASI, including 3rd and 4th-degree tears per OASIS classification). DRE and impedance measurements using the ONIRY system were performed. The machine learning (ML) model for ONIRY was trained and validated. The diagnostic outcomes of ONIRY and DRE were compared to EAUS. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: DRE's performance versus EAUS was 67.8% for accuracy, 44.3% for sensitivity, and 83.5% for specificity. After completion of ML model training, impedance spectroscopy's accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 87.0%, 90.6%, and 84.6%, respectively, compared with EAUS. Conclusion: DRE is insufficient for OASI detection. The ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy demonstrated higher accuracy and could facilitate rapid OASI detection post-delivery. Funding: The study was financed by the European Union's Fast Track program through the Polish National Centre for Research and Development (POIR.01.01.01-00-0726/18) Keywords: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), anal sphincter, perineal tear, faecal incontinence, rapid diagnostics, impedance spectroscopy, machine learning, endoanal ultrasound
Three‐Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of the Anal Sphincter Immediately After Vaginal Birth: An Exploratory Study

Laura Cattani,Bram Packet,Adela Samešova,Helena Williams,Dominique Van Schoubroeck,Jan Deprest

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16490

2024-06-14

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Abstract:Objectives To assess the feasibility of acquiring adequate transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) volumes of the anal sphincter (AS) immediately after vaginal birth, the reproducibility of its measurements, and detecting defects therein. Methods Secondary analysis of TPUS volumes of the AS, acquired immediately after vaginal birth with a transversely oriented convex probe. Two independent experts ranked off‐line image quality as "inadequate," "adequate," or "ideal" using the Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound Image Quality scale. On "adequate" and "ideal" quality volumes, the length of the external AS at 6 and 12 o'clock, and the volume of the external and internal AS were measured. Additionally, volumes were screened for AS defects on tomographic ultrasound imaging. Subsequently, we rated the intra‐ and interrater agreement on those findings. Results Of 183 volumes, 162 were considered "adequate" or of "ideal" quality (88.5%). Reasons for "inadequacy" were shadow artifacts (16/21), poor resolution (3/21), incomplete acquisition (1/21), or aberrant AS morphology (1/21). The intrarater reliability of two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) measurements was excellent, whereas interrater reliability was fair to good for 2D measurements and good for 3D measurements. In those tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) sequences including AS defects, the intra‐ and interrater reliability of the defect measurement were excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.92 (0.80–0.94)] and moderate [ICC = 0.72 (0.63–0.79)]. In this cohort, there were only few (4/48; 8.3%) AS defects. However, grading them was poorly reproducible between experts. Conclusion TPUS of the AS immediately after vaginal birth yields adequate image quality and allows for reproducible measurements. In the few patients with AS defects, there was good agreement on the presence, but it was poor for the extent of defects.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,acoustics
EP07.69: Unveiling the unforeseen: antenatal diagnosis of high anorectal malformation masquerading as an intrabdominal mass"

W.C. Chua,V.L. Velayudham,H. Abu Hassan,S. Abu Hanet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28317

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 181-181, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury significantly impacts quality of life for women: a cohort study

Emeline Rebmann,Jean-Francois Hamel,Candice Helbert,Florine Lemasson,Guillaume Legendre,Aurélien Venara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03257-4

2024-02-18

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery

Abstract:To assess the prevalence of anal incontinence (AI) after obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and its severity, as well as the risk factors for AI and AI episodes ≥ 6 months.

surgery
Prevention and Management of Severe Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs): a National Survey of Nurse- Midwives

Sindi Diko,Maryam Guiahi,Amy Nacht,Kathleen A Connell,Shane Reeves,Beth A Bailey,K Joseph Hurt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03897-x

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesis: There are no data on midwives' knowledge and management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) in the USA. We performed a cross-sectional national survey characterizing OASI practice by certified nurse midwives (CNMs), hypothesizing that few midwives personally repair OASIs and that there are gaps in CNM OASI training/education. Methods: We emailed a REDCap internet-based survey to 6909 American College of Nurse Midwives members (ACNM). We analyzed responses from active clinicians performing at least one delivery per month, asking about OASI risks, prevention, repair, and management. We summarized descriptive data then evaluated OASI knowledge by patient and provider characteristics. Results: We received 1070 (15.5%) completed surveys, and 832 (77.8%) met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Participants were similar to ACNM membership. Respondents most frequently identified prior OASI (87%) and nutrition (71%) as antepartum OASI risk factors and, less frequently, nulliparity (36%) and race (22%). Identified intrapartum risks included forceps delivery (94%) and midline episiotomy (88%). When obstetric laceration is suspected, 13.6% of respondents perform a rectal examination routinely. Only 15% of participants personally perform OASI repair. Overall, participants matched 64% of evidence-based answers. OASI education/training courses were attended by 30% of respondents, and 44% knew of OASI protocols within their group/institution. Of all factors evaluated, the percent of evidence-based responses was only different for respondent education/CME and protocols. Conclusions: Quality initiatives regarding OASI prevention and management may improve care. Our data suggest OASI training for midwives may improve delivery care in the US. Further studies of other obstetric providers are needed.
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions

Dharmesh S. Kapoor,Ranee Thakar,Abdul H. Sultan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2747-0

2015-06-05

International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesisObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are the leading cause of anal incontinence in women. Modification of various risk factors and anatomical considerations have been reported to reduce the rate of OASI.MethodsA PubMed search (1989–2014) of studies and systematic reviews on risk factors for OASI.ResultsPerineal distension (stretching) of 170 % in the transverse direction and 40 % in the vertical direction occurs at crowning, leading to significant differences (15–30°) between episiotomy incision angles and suture angles. Episiotomies incised at 60° achieve suture angles of 43–50°; those incised at 40° result in a suture angle of 22°. Episiotomies with suture angles too acute (<30°) and too lateral (>60°) are associated with an increased risk of OASI. Suture angles of 40–60° are in the safe zone. Clinicians are poor at correctly estimating episiotomy angles on paper and in patients. Sutured episiotomies originating 10 mm away from the midline are associated with a lower rate of OASIs. Compared to spontaneous tears, episiotomies appear to be associated with a reduction in OASI risk by 40–50 %, whereas shorter perineal lengths, perineal oedema and instrumental deliveries are associated with a higher risk. Instrumental deliveries with mediolateral episiotomies are associated with a significantly lower OASI risk. Other preventative measures include warm perineal compresses and controlled delivery of the head.ConclusionsRelieving pressure on the central posterior perineum by an episiotomy and/or controlled delivery of the head should be important considerations in reducing the risk of OASI. Episiotomies should be performed 60° from the midline. Prospective studies should evaluate elective episiotomies in women with a short perineal length and application of standardised digital perineal support.

urology & nephrology,obstetrics & gynecology
EP01.31: Agreement between measurements of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator ani muscle hiatus using 2D versus automated 3D transperineal ultrasound

E. Brunelli,F. Dapoto,B. Nedu,G. Pilu,A. Youssef

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28045

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 115-115, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries After Training to Protect the Perineum

Jennifer Yeung,Anna Stecher,Catrina C. Crisp,Donna Mazloomdoost,Benjamin Smith,Steven D. Kleeman,Rachel N. Pauls,Stecher, Anna,Smith, Benjamin,Pauls, Rachel N.,Crisp, Catrina C.,Kleeman, Steven D.,Yeung, Jennifer,Mazloomdoost, Donna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000506

2019-10-03

Abstract:Objectives Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASISs) are a devastating postpartum complication; reducing rates is paramount to improving quality of care. In Norway, implementation of a perineal protection program decreased the incidence of OASIS by 48%. We sought to assess impact on OASIS rates following a similar program. Methods This institutional review board–approved, retrospective cohort study was performed in an academic hospital system. The periods of analysis were November 2014 through October 2015 for the preintervention arm and November 2015 through October 2016 for the postintervention arm. From November 2 to 6, 2015, 2 Norwegian experts conducted a didactic and hands-on, on-site workshop focusing on perineal protection. The experts were then present on labor and delivery wards to reinforce perineal protection in live deliveries. Teachings were emphasized at departmental meetings for the remainder of the year. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and manually audited. Results The rate of vaginal delivery was similar among both periods (6504 and 6650; P = 0.059). Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates decreased from 211 (3.2%) preintervention to 189 (2.8%) after the workshop. Although this represented 32 fewer injuries, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.179). Obstetric anal sphincter injuries following forceps-assisted deliveries did decline significantly from 103 (28%) to 81 (21%) (P = 0.014). In addition, incidence of fourth-degree lacerations during resident deliveries decreased significantly from 10 (0.6%) to 3 (0.2%) (P = 0.047). Conclusions An educational workshop focusing on perineal support was not associated with a significant reduction in overall OASIS rates. Nevertheless, decreased forceps-related OASIS and fourth-degree lacerations rates support positive influence of the intervention.

obstetrics & gynecology
EP23.31: Assessment of the accuracy and safety of ultrasound guided tru‐cut biopsy in a tertiary hospital from 1 Jan 2021–31 Dec 2022: a retrospective study

A.C. Panganiban,N.P. Pangilinan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28967

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 337-337, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Obstetric anal sphincter injury after episiotomy in vacuum extraction: an epidemiological study using an emulated randomised trial approach

V Ankarcrona,H Zhao,B Jacobsson,S Brismar Wendel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16663

2021-03-09

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To emulate a randomized controlled trial investigating if lateral or mediolateral episiotomy compared to no episiotomy reduces the prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) in nulliparous women delivered with vacuum extraction.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Design</h3><p>A population‐based observational study.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Setting</h3><p>Sweden.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Population</h3><p>63 654 nulliparous women delivered with vacuum extraction derived from the Swedish Medical Birth Register 2000‐2011, with a live singleton baby without known malformations in cephalic presentation in gestational week ≥34+0, and subject to lateral or mediolateral episiotomy or no episiotomy.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The effect of episiotomy was calculated using a causal doubly robust estimation method based on propensity scores. Results are presented as the average treatment effect and numbers needed to treat (NNT).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>OASIS (third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal injury) in nulliparous women delivered with vacuum extraction.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Episiotomy was associated with a reduction in OASIS from 15.5% to 11.8%, average treatment effect ‐3.66% (95% CI ‐4.31 to ‐3.01) and NNT 27. Third‐degree perineal injuries were reduced from 14.0% to 10.9% (‐3.08, 95% CI ‐3.71 to ‐2.42) with NNT 32. Fourth‐degree perineal injuries were reduced from 1.6% to 1.0 % (‐0.58%, 95% CI ‐0.79 to ‐0.37) with NNT 172.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy reduced the prevalence of OASIS in nulliparous women delivered with vacuum extraction, compared to women with no episiotomy.</p></section>

obstetrics & gynecology

EP26.01: Prevalence of anal sphincter injuries identified using endoanal ultrasound among primipara women: a cross‐sectional analytical study

OC18.05: Three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter immediately after vaginal birth: an exploratory study

Underdiagnosis of internal anal sphincter trauma following vaginal delivery

OP14.06: A preliminary study on the measurement of anal sphincter in healthy adult women by transluminal dual plane shear wave elastography

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury After Episiometer-Guided Versus Conventional Episiotomy in Instrumental Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

EP19.21: The use of vaginal probe transperineal as screening tool of occult perineal tear in postpartum women

Incidence and Risk Factors for Secondary Failure after Acute Obstetric Sphincter Injury Repair – an Audit of 239 Women

EP26.03: Transvaginal two‐dimensional sonographic assessment for detecting levator ani muscle trauma in women after childbirth

The influence of the fundal pressure manoeuvre at delivery on the anal sphincter injury diagnosed with endoanal ultrasonography

Obstetric Characteristics and Functional Outcomes in Women with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicenter clinical study

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries detection by digital rectal examination and impedance spectroscopy: post-hoc analysis of the results from a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study

Three‐Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of the Anal Sphincter Immediately After Vaginal Birth: An Exploratory Study

EP07.69: Unveiling the unforeseen: antenatal diagnosis of high anorectal malformation masquerading as an intrabdominal mass"

Anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury significantly impacts quality of life for women: a cohort study

Prevention and Management of Severe Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs): a National Survey of Nurse- Midwives

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions

EP01.31: Agreement between measurements of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator ani muscle hiatus using 2D versus automated 3D transperineal ultrasound

Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries After Training to Protect the Perineum

EP23.31: Assessment of the accuracy and safety of ultrasound guided tru‐cut biopsy in a tertiary hospital from 1 Jan 2021–31 Dec 2022: a retrospective study

Obstetric anal sphincter injury after episiotomy in vacuum extraction: an epidemiological study using an emulated randomised trial approach