Why community consultation matters in genomic research benefit-sharing models

Sarah LeBaron von Baeyer,Rebecca Crocker,Rindra Rakotoarivony,Jean Freddy Ranaivoarisoa,Germain Jules Spiral,Stephane Castel,Andrew Farnum,Holly Vance,Noah Collins,Keolu Fox,Kaja Wasik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.278308.123
IF: 9.438
2024-02-08
Genome Research
Abstract:Despite increasing calls for benefit sharing to promote greater equity in human genomic research, established precedents across the private and public spheres are lacking. Moreover, the few existing models for benefit sharing with populations that participate in genomic research are largely limited to intangible or nonfinancial benefits, or to top-down initiatives that generally do not draw on direct input from participating populations. Here, we present a model of financial benefit sharing that goes hand in hand with other important benefits such as scientific capacity building and data sharing and in which the priorities and needs of participating communities are identified and used to steer funding decisions. By discussing the implementation of this collective-interest model in the context of an industry-funded genomic research project in Madagascar, we offer a practical example for how to institute community-driven distribution of financial benefits. Despite the challenges involved in this process, we believe that consulting communities around financial benefits serves to both increase equity in genomic research and support locally determined needs.
genetics & heredity,biochemistry & molecular biology,biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?