Validation and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mindful Eating Inventory in Adults

Bozkurt, Osman,Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Betul,Mengi Çelik, Özge,Köksal, Eda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02272-8

2024-01-07

Mindfulness

Abstract:This study examined the validity and reliability of the Mindful Eating Inventory (MEI) to measure mindful eating in Turkish adults.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Development and validation of the mindful eating scale (mind-eat scale) in a general population

Marion Van Beekum,Rebecca Shankland,Angélique Rodhain,Margaux Robert,Camille Marchand,Athéna Herry,Clémentine Prioux,Mathilde Touvier,Marie Barday,Roxane Turgon,Antoine Avignon,Christophe Leys,Sandrine Péneau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107398

IF: 5.016

2024-08-01

Appetite

Abstract:Background: Mindful eating is a concept that is increasingly being used to promote healthy eating. Observational studies have suggested associations with healthier eating behaviors, lower weight status, and favorable cardiovascular biomarkers. However, existing scales assessing mindful eating have some limitations. Our study aimed to develop and validate a scale assessing the level of mindful eating in a general population. Methods: The Mind-Eat Scale was developed in four main steps: 1. Generating an initial item pool covering all aspects of mindful eating; 2. Reviewing items with experts and naive individuals; 3. Administering the scale to a large and representative sample from the NutriNet-Santé cohort (N = 3102); 4. Conducting psychometric analyses. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory (EFA) (N1 = 1302) and confirmatory (CFA) (N2 = 1302, N3 = 498) factor analyses. Content, discriminant, convergent, and divergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were examined. Results: The initial pool of 95 items was refined to 24 items using EFA. The EFA highlighted six dimensions: Awareness, Non-reactivity, Openness, Gratitude, Non-judgement, and Hunger/Satiety, consisting of four items per dimension. CFAs showed a good fit for first and second-order models. Adequate content validity was confirmed. Discriminant, convergent, and divergent validity were supported by significant differences between subgroups of individuals, and correlations with eating behaviors and psychological well-being scales. The Mind-Eat Scale showed good reliability for all six dimensions, with high McDonald's ω and adequate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Conclusions: This study validated the first tool assessing a total mindful eating score and its sub-dimensions in a general population. This scale can be an asset for clinical and epidemiological research on dietary behavior and related chronic diseases.
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the eating in the absence of hunger in children and adolescents (EAH-C)

Hatice Başkale,Hilal Parlak Sert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.03.018

2024-03-23

Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Abstract:Background and purpose Eating in the absence of hunger is a risk factor for excessive energy intake and predisposes children to overweight/obesity. The purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the "Eating in the Absence of Hunger Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (EAH-C)" in Türkiye. Methods This study was conducted in a total of six schools, with children 8–18 years old between September and December 2022. Factor analysis, item–total score analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were used for the validity and reliability. Results The calculated KMO statistic was >0.60, and the Bartlett's test statistic was <0.05. The three subscales accounted for 65.22% of the total variance. Factor loads ranged from 0.41 to 0.84. The value obtained by dividing χ 2 by the number of degrees of freedom was <5; the RMSEA was <0.10; the RMR was 0.90. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.91 for the total scale. Conclusions Our study has confirmed that the Turkish-language version of the EAH-C is a valid and reliable tool. Practice implications In the effort of prevention of childhood obesity, identifying eating behaviors in the absence of hunger in children and adolescents will benefit policymakers to develop intervention and prevention programs, in addition to providing guidance to pediatric nurses, all healthcare professionals, researchers, children, and parents.

nursing,pediatrics
Validation of the 14-item mediterranean diet adherence screener

Cansu Bekar,Zeynep Goktas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.12.026

Abstract:Background: The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is suggested as a healthy dietary pattern. 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire is a valid and rapid tool to estimate the adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener in Turkish population. Methods: A total of 188 people (%58 females) participated in this study (31.7 ± 10.97 years). Turkish version of the MEDAS questionnaire was applied with 3-day food record, and mean total Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) score and each of the MedDiet component scores was calculated from both 3-day food records and MEDAS tool. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the total score agreement between the two dietary assessment methods, and each of the MedDiet components was estimated using Cohen's kappa. This project was a cross-sectional study. Results: There was good correlation between the food record total MEdDiet score and MEDAS-derived MedDiet score (r = 0.750, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.749, 95% CI 0.679-0.806, p < 0.001). Highest concordance was observed for olive oil for cooking (К = 0.763), sugar sweetened beverages (К = 0.666), sweets, pastries (К = 0.753), and sofrito (К = 0.796) while the lowest was for fish and seafood (К = 0.196). Re-test analysis showed a similar mean total MedDiet score for both administrations of MEDAS. Conclusions: The MEDAS is a valid and reliable tool to assess adherence to the Mediterranean diet in Turkish population.
Behaviors scale towards sustainable nutrition: development and validity-reliability analysis

Gokcen Garipoglu,Bilge Meral Koc,Tugce Ozlu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-09-2022-0335

2023-06-10

Abstract:Purpose The evaluation of sustainable eating behaviors of individuals who constitute the society is important in the interpretation of both health-related and environmental effects. Therefore, this study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale to assess the sustainable food consumption behaviors of adults living in Turkey. Design/methodology/approach The validity of the scale was evaluated by using the factor analysis, correlation analysis and comparison of the lower and upper 27% groups with the t-test technique. Cronbach's alpha (CA), split-half, parallel and strict criteria were used to determine the internal consistency of the scale, and the Pearson correlation analysis was conducted for the test and retest. The explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to test construct validity. Findings The total variance rate explained by all the factors was 77.03%. CA value of the scale was 0.92, and the test–retest reliability coefficient was 0.96. The difference between the lower and upper 27% group means was significant at the p < 0.05 level. The factor structure of the scale was confirmed by the results of the confirmatory factor analysis. Originality/value There are scales in the international literature that have been validated to evaluate various aspects of behaviors related to sustainable food consumption (Tobler et al., 2011; Verain et al., 2015). However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there are no validity and reliability studies of a scale developed in Turkey on sustainable food consumption of adults.
Investigation of psychometric properties of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire in Chinese adolescents and young adults using mixed methods

Qian Zhang,Siobhan Hugh-Jones,Daryl B. O''Connor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106097

IF: 5.016

2022-09-01

Appetite

Abstract:Overweight and obesity are major public health challenges in China, and increasingly among young people. Valid measures are needed to examine the relationship between eating styles and weight to advance understanding and intervention. Mindful approaches show promise in weight management. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of Mindful Eating Questionnaire (C-MEQ). Study 1 used a think aloud methodology to examine Chinese young adults' (n = 7) and adolescents’ (n = 10) comprehension of C-MEQ items. Findings informed revision of problematic items before a full validation study (Study 2) of the revised C-MEQ (C-MEQ-R) in a sample of 430 Chinese young adults. In Study 1, both groups misinterpreted ten items as asking about noticing about whether behaviour ever occurred rather than noticing experience, indicating the lack of content validity of the C-MEQ. Ten items were rephrased to emphasise mindful (intentional) noticing in the moment. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis revealed an inadequate fit to the original MEQ structure. Exploratory Structural Equation Model of the C-MEQ-R revealed five distinct domains. The C-MEQ-R showed better psychometric properties than the C-MEQ, and significant associations with mindfulness, emotional eating, external eating and BMI in expected directions. However, psychometric limitations including low internal reliability, inadequate coherence of the subscales and limited construct validity were identified. These findings contribute to the progress in the measurement of mindful eating by highlighting the weaknesses of the MEQ. Further research is called to adopt and validate alternative mindful eating measurements to assess mindful eating in Chinese adolescents and young adults.

nutrition & dietetics,behavioral sciences
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Salzburg Stress Eating Scale for children and adolescents

Hamide Zengin,Aslı Akdeniz Kudubes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06312-x

IF: 2.8

2024-07-25

Current Psychology

Abstract:Stress changes the food preferences of individuals, causing an increase in the intake of sweet food, and consequently, the total energy. Stress also leads to a short-term reduction in the appetite. These two contrary scenarios result in nutritional problems in the affected population. In this context, a validity and reliability study was conducted for the Salzburg Stress Eating Scale (SSES) adapted for children and adolescents and presented here. The study was designed as a methodological, descriptive, and correlational study, conducted with 9–18-year-old students ( n = 257). A socio-demographic information form and the SSES were used for data collection. The collected data were evaluated based on factor analysis, discriminatory power, McDonald's omega, Cronbach's alpha, and the item–total score. The contribution of the ten-item scale to total variance was determined to be 48.869%. The factor loadings of the scale determined based on the exploratory factor analysis and the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were above 0.30. The fit indices were found to be well matched and the questionnaire had a one-factor structure. The McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha values determined for the scale were 0.884 and 0.881, respectively. The correlation analysis of the items with the scale's total score revealed values ranging between 0.470 and 0.757. Accordingly, it was concluded that the SSES was a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish-speaking students in the 9–18 age group. Therefore, the SSES is applicable for the assessment of stress eating among children and adolescents aged 9–18 in the general population. It is recommended to adapt the scale in different cultures to determine the level of direct stress eating in children and adolescents and the affecting factors.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Turkish Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM) in University Students

Yasemin Açar,Betül Sukan Karaçağıl,Meleknur Demirkoparan,Betül Şeref,Zeynep Kalaycı,Ayda Uçar,Hilal Yıldıran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980024000223

2024-01-25

Public Health Nutrition

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM). Design: A cross-sectional study collected data from 117 university students. The AFSSM Questionnaire was completed by all participants. Psychometric evaluation for scale, content, construct, and convergent validity and reliability of the scale was tested. The construct validity was assessed by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on data collected from university students. Cronbach's α (internal consistency) and composite reliability were used to assess the reliability (p<0.05). Setting: Students were recruited from the university. Participants: This research was conducted with volunteer university students with a mean age of 22.74 ± 4.19 years. Results: Three factors were extracted from 8 items through EFA: (1) inadequate nutrition, (2) economic concern, and (3) hunger. These factors accounted for 77.4% of the total variance, and factor loadings ranged from 0.755 to 0.953. Cronbach's α was 0.769. The results of the CFA suggested the fit indices were acceptable (χ 2 /SD = 0.235, root mean error of approximation: 0.034, goodness-of-fit index: 0.994, comparative fit index: 0.992, and normed fit index: 0.986). Conclusions: This is the first study that validates and reports the Turkish version of AFSSM in university students and the results of our study show that the Turkish AFSSM is a valid and reliable tool for determining food security in university students. AFSSM can be used by researchers to examine the food security of university students.

public, environmental & occupational health,nutrition & dietetics
Initial Validation of the Brazilian Mindful Eating Scale Among Overweight and Low-Income Women

Demarzo, Marcelo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02122-7

2023-04-15

Mindfulness

Abstract:To objective of the present study was to investigate the initial evidence for construct validity of the Brazilian Mindful Eating Scale (MES-B), developed to assess mindfulness in the context of eating behavior.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in Patients With Cognitive Impairment

İmge Coskun Pektas,Cansu Budak,Kadir Pektas,Cansun Sahin Cam,Rumeysa Tasdelen,Can Ilgin,Serhat Ergun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231225485

2024-02-21

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Abstract:Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, Ahead of Print. Background and ObjectiveThe Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) was developed to detect and standardize neuropsychiatric symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the MBI-C.MethodsThe sample of our study consisted of 80 patients with cognitive impairment and a control group with 113 participants whose cognitive impairment was not detected in standard tests. Participants were evaluated with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), MBI-C and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).Results and ConclusionIn the reliability analysis, the Cronbach-alpha value for MBI-C was found to be .810. In the ROC analysis performed with the total MBI-C score, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as .821 and the cut-off score was determined as 8.5; sensitivity was calculated as .77 and specificity as .83. A strong positive correlation was found between test-retest MBI-C scores (r = .886, P < .0019). A strong positive correlation was found between MBI-C and NPI scores (r = .964, P < .001). MBI-C scores were significantly negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores and positively correlated with GDS-15 scores. The results of our study showed that the Turkish version of the MBI-C is a valid and reliable measurement.

psychiatry,clinical neurology,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Translation and Modification of a Mindful Eating Questionnaire for Children Assisted by Item Response Theory in Chinese Children and Adolescents

Dan Wang,Yuzheng Hu,Hui Zhou,Zhihong Ye,Junfen Fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142854

IF: 5.9

2022-07-12

Nutrients

Abstract:Mindful eating has gained attention in studies on healthy eating. However, measurement of it is scarce, particularly in pediatrics. This study aimed to translate and modify the 12-item Mindful Eating Questionnaire for Children (MEQ-C) using techniques based on both classical test theory (ICC) and item response theory (IRT) in Chinese children and adolescents. Of the 426 participants enrolled and randomly grouped, the test (n = 223) and validation (n = 203) subsamples were well-matched in age, gender, body mass index z score (BMIz), and waist to height ratio (WHtR) (p > 0.556). Three items were eliminated due to deviating from the mindful eating concept (content validity index < 0.71) and presenting as an independent dimension in parallel analysis, or yielding a poor distribution (−4.331 < b 1, −3 < b < 3), and the Mindless Eating subscale was accurate for the low-to-medium range (−2 to 0) of the mindful eating measure. The Awareness one was reliable for the relatively high range (0 to 2). Participants' mindful eating characteristics should be taken into consideration in practice.

nutrition & dietetics
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity in Young Adult Athletes

Yunus Eme Tütüneken,Pınar Van Der Veer,Kübra Kardeş,Yasemin Buran Çırak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2024.2339807

2024-04-10

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Abstract:Mindfulness is growing in popularity with the potential to improve many favorable health outcomes. Physical activity (PA) is crucial for improving health, however, there is no Turkish scale to measure mindfulness during PA. The purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Turkish version of The State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity (SMS-PA-T). One hundred thirty-seven young adult athletes were included. The validity was determined using the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. The SMS-PA-T had a high-level internal consistency (α = 0.80) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.61 to 0.72 for subscales). The SMS-PA-T subscales were correlated with the BREQ-2 ( r = 0.65 to 0.77, p < .005) indicating a good concurrent validity. The results show that the SMS-PA-T proved to be a valid and reliable scale for young adult athletes. The SMS-PA-T provides an easy-to-administer and useful tool to assess.

sport sciences,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism,education & educational research
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale

Kübra İNCİRKUŞ,Nursen ÖZKAN NAHCİVAN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-13

2020-08-26

TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Abstract:Background/aim: The measurement of self-efficacy is an important step toward improving chronic disease management, enhancing adherence to treatment, and assessing patients with chronic diseases. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale.Materials and methods: In this methodological study, the sample consisted of 211 patients receiving chronic disease care in 2 family health centers in İstanbul, Turkey. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, concurrent validity, Cronbach’s alpha, item-total correlation, and test-retest reliability.Results: Most of the sample were women (72%), primary school graduates (41.7%), hypertensive (68.7%), and had comorbidities (68.2%). The mean age of the sample was 60.5 ± 10.9. The scale mean was 5.66 ± 2.28. Cronbach’s alpha reliability was 0.90. Item-total correlations were between 0.64–0.85 and test-retest reliability was high (R = 0.95, P < 0.001). A positive, significant correlation was found in concurrent validity. According to the results of factor analysis, the scale had a 2-dimensional structure.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess perceived the self-efficacy level of patient with chronic disease.

medicine, general & internal
Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study

Yasemin Ertaş Öztürk,Sevtap Kabalı,Yasemin Açar,Duygu Ağagündüz,Ferenc Budán

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16193416

IF: 5.9

2024-10-09

Nutrients

Abstract:Background: Food literacy is associated with sustainable food systems and encourages individuals to adopt healthy eating habits. However, there is no validated method that can be used to measure food literacy related to sustainable food systems of Turkish adults. This research aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the "Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool" for Turkish adults. Methods: The study involved 328 people aged 19 to 58 years. The FOODLIT-Tool is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 24 items and five factors ("culinary competencies", "production and quality", "selection and planning", "environmentally safe" and "origin"). Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was applied to assess internal consistency reliability, showing an excellent scale coefficient of 0.927. The model was evaluated with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The findings of the CFA suggested that the fit indices were acceptable (χ2/df = 1.257, comparative fit index: 0.991, goodness-of-fit index: 0.977, normed fit index: 0.990 and root mean error of approximation: 0.028). Furthermore, there was a positive relationship between the FOODLIT-Tool score and the "Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviors Scale" (SHEB) score (r = 0.518, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study shows that the Turkish version of the FOODLIT-Tool integrated with sustainable food systems is a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing the food literacy of Turkish adults.

nutrition & dietetics
Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Relationship Mindfulness Measure in an Emerging Adult Sample

Nureda Taşkesen,Funda Barutçu Yıldırım

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968241246302

IF: 1.83

2024-04-13

Emerging Adulthood

Abstract:Emerging Adulthood, Ahead of Print. While latest research has accepted the importance of mindfulness in mental health, its role in interpersonal well-being receives less attention, including the necessary measurement tools. This study aimed to translate the Relationship Mindfulness Measure (RMM) into Turkish and explore its psychometric properties with unmarried Turkish emerging adults. A total of 191 university students (age range 18–29, M = 22.90, SD = 2.78) in committed romantic relationships participated in this study. The convergent validity analysis revealed a positive relation of RMM with trait mindfulness (r = .47, p < .001) and a negative relation with negative affect (r = −.21, p = .05). Internal and test-retest reliability of RMM was acceptable (α = .78, r = .67). The unidimensional factor structure of 5-item RMM was supported, and no common method variance was observed. Overall, findings indicated that Turkish RMM is a valid and reliable measure to assess emerging adults' relationship mindfulness.

family studies,psychology, social, developmental
Evaluation of the Relationships Among Mindful Eating, Environmental Beliefs, Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, and Obesity in Children

Osman Bozkurt,Betül Kocaadam Bozkurt,Emine Koçyiğit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23173

Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD), mindful eating, environmental beliefs, and obesity in children. Materials and methods: The study included 318 children (50.6% male, 49.4% female, 10.0 ± 0.73 years old). Data were obtained using survey and a face-to-face interview method. The questionnaire includes general information, anthropometric measurements, the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for Children (NEP), the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index for children and adolescents (KIDMED), and the Mindful Eating Questionnaire for Children. Results: According to the KIDMED classification, 52.5% of the children were in the group that needs improvement, 35.2% were in the low diet quality group, and 12.3% were in the optimal MD group. The Mindless score was higher in overweight/obese children compared to the normal body mass index (BMI) group (P < .05). Awareness, NEP, and KIDMED scores were the lowest in overweight/obese children (P < .05). In regression analysis, the father's age, KIDMED, and Awareness scores related to NEP scores positively (R2 : 0.545, P < .001). Also, children's body mass index-related KIDMED scores negatively, and awareness and NEP scores related KIDMED scores positively (R2 : 0.276, P < .001). Conclusion: Our results show that higher adherence to the MD is associated with higher environmental beliefs. Children with higher mindful eating have higher environmental beliefs and adherence to the MD, and these scores are lower in obese children. Therefore, raising generations that adopt sustainable diet models and have high environmental awareness is necessary. This research provides significant findings for future clinical studies on children's body weight maintenance and sustainability. Cite this article as: Bozkurt O, Kocaadam-Bozkurt B, Koçyiğit E. Evaluation of the relationships among mindful eating, environmental beliefs, adherence to the mediterranean diet, and obesity in children. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(1):98-105.
Validity and reliability of the Sustainable HEalthy Diet (SHED) index by comparison with EAT-Lancet diet, Mediterranean diet in Turkish adults

Burcu Aksoy Canyolu,Daniela Martini,Nilüfer Şen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18120

IF: 3.061

2024-09-30

PeerJ

Abstract:Background: Food consumption and diet are strongly associated with sustainability. The Sustainable HEalthy Diet index was developed to measure the nutritional, environmental, and sociocultural components of sustainable diets and healthy eating patterns. However, a methodological approach has yet to be proposed for Turkish adults. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the SHED index in Turkish adults. Methods: Data were collected from 558 healthy adults using a web-based questionnaire. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and repeatability was evaluated using the test-retest method. Construct validity was investigated using the EAT-Lancet diet and the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), and the adapted SHED index structures' accordance was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis. Results: Good reliability and repeatability were found (r = 0.758 and 0.795, respectively). A higher SHED index score was related to a greater intake of grains, fruits, and vegetables and a lower intake of meat, eggs, and dairy compared to EAT-Lancet diet food groups. A higher SHED index score was associated with a lower saturated fat and added sugar intake. While the SHED index was associated with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet (r = 0.334, p < 0.001), it was negatively associated with non-alcoholic and diet non-alcoholic beverage consumption (r = -0.257 and -0.264, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The SHED index showed good validity and reliability in Turkish adults. Our results suggest that the SHED index can be used in epidemiological and intervention studies because it allows the measurement of diets in terms of health and sustainability to propose adaptations accordingly.
Psychometric properties of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) in Turkish adolescents

Meryem Kaşak,Hakan Öğütlü,Uğur Doğan,Hana F Zickgraf,Mehmet Hakan Türkçapar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01066-0

2024-07-25

Abstract:Background: This study evaluates the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) in a population of Turkish adolescents. Method: The NIAS, designed to screen for ARFID symptoms, including picky eating, fear-related eating behaviors, and low appetite, was administered to secondary school students between 13 and 18 ages in Muğla, Turkiye. Results: Based on a sample of 268 adolescents, the NIAS's reliability and validity in this demographic are supported. The research utilized confirmatory factor analysis to verify its three-factor structure and various reliability tests, including Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability, confirming the scale's internal consistency and temporal stability. The descriptive analysis highlighted significant differences in NIAS scores across BMI categories, with underweight adolescents scoring higher, suggesting a potential link between ARFID symptoms and lower body weight. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations between NIAS subscales and measures of anxiety, depression, and eating behaviors, indicating the scale's effectiveness in reflecting relevant psychopathological features. Conclusion: Overall, the study establishes the Turkish NIAS as a useful tool for identifying ARFID in Turkish adolescents, aiding early detection and intervention in this at-risk age group. Further research is recommended to explore the scale's utility across different clinical settings and refine its diagnostic accuracy, enhancing our understanding of ARFID's impact on youth mental health and nutritional status.
Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2) in a sample of community adults

Feten Fekih-Romdhane,Chen Jiang,Sahar Obeid,Diana Malaeb,Nancy Chammas,Mirna Fawaz,Michel Soufia,Runtang Meng,Souheil Hallit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00782-3

2023-04-01

Abstract:Background: There is a growing attention on intuitive eating (IE) styles in the Western world that has not yet reached Arab countries, which is likely due to the lack of psychometrically sound measures of the IE construct for Arabic-speaking people. The current study aims to examine the psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the most widely used measure of IE-the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2), in an Arabic-speaking community population from Lebanon. Methods: Two samples of Arabic-speaking community adults from Lebanon (sample 1: n = 359, 59.9% females, age 22.75 ± 7.04 years; sample 2: n = 444, 72.7% females, age 27.25 ± 9.53 years) were recruited through online convenience sampling. The translation and back-translation method was applied to the IES-2 for linguistic validation. Factorial validity was investigated using an Exploratory Factor Analysis & Confirmatory Factor Analysis strategy. Composite reliability and sex invariance were examined. We also tested convergent and criterion-related validity through correlations with other theoretically plausible constructs. Results: Nine out of the original 23 items were removed because they either loaded below 0.40 and/or cross-loaded too highly on multiple factors. This resulted in four domains (Unconditional Permission to Eat, Eating for Physical Rather than Emotional Reasons, Reliance on Hunger and Satiety Cues, and Body-Food Choice Congruence) and 14 items retained. Internal reliability estimates were excellent, with McDonald's ω values ranging from 0.828 to 0.923 for the four factors. Multigroup analysis established configural, thresholds, metric, scalar, strict invariance across gender. Finally, higher IES-2 total scores were significantly correlated with lower body dissatisfaction scores and more positive eating attitudes, thus attesting to convergent and criterion-related validity of the scale. Conclusions: The current findings provide preliminary evidence for the appropriate psychometric qualities of the Arabic 14-item, four-factor structure IES-2; thereby supporting its use at least among Arabic-speaking community adults.
Turkish version of a short nutrition literacy scale for young adults: cultural adaptation and validation

Mustafa Can Koc,Elif Yildirim,Ozkan Isik,Pelin Aksen,Laurentiu-Gabriel Talaghir,Ciprian Zanfir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1422738

2024-07-22

Abstract:Background: Recent changes in nutrition trends may lead to health issues. In particular, the unhealthy eating habits of young adults suggest that future generations may be at risk. Therefore, the importance and necessity of nutrition literacy is becoming increasingly apparent. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to create a Turkish version of a short nutrition literacy (S-NutLit-Tr) scale for young adults developed by Vrinten et al (2023). Methods: This research involved 115 young adults from Istanbul Gelişim University, who were selected through convenience sampling, a non-probability sampling method. After the original S-NutLit scale was translated into Turkish, the validity and reliability of the determined factor structure were tested on 115 young adults. Internal consistency was examined with the Cronbach Alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to validate the two sub-scale structures. Finally, measurement invariance was tested concerning participants' gender, aiming to ascertain whether the scale captured equivalent characteristics across different groups. Results: As a result of the reliability analysis conducted with the scale of S-NutLit-Tr, the Cronbach Alpha coefficient was obtained as 0.86 for the scale of S-NutLit-Tr. Additionally, it was found to be 0.84 and 0.77 for the "information skills" and "expert skills" sub-scales, respectively. Accordingly, the scale of S-NutLit-Tr was found to be reliable. To examine the two sub-scale factor structures of the S-NutLit-Tr scale, fit indices were examined: χ2/df (1.246), GFI (0.923), IFI (0.975), TLI (0.967), CFI (0.974), RMSEA (0.046), and SRMR (0.055) and it was observed that the indices were within acceptable limits. In the analysis results obtained through the multi-group confirmatory factor analysis for measurement invariance, it was observed that the ∆CFI and ∆TLI values across all indices were less than or equal to 0.01. Consequently, it was observed that the item-factor structure, factor loadings, variances, covariances, and error variances of the scale were equivalent for both male and female young adults. Conclusion: The study found that the scale of S-NutLit-Tr for young adults was a valid and reliable measurement tool in Turkish culture.
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Australian National University-Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI)

Feyza Mutlay,Alev Cam Mahser,Burcu Akpinar Soylemez,Esra Ates Bulut,Kadriye Petek,Mehmet Selman Ontan,Derya Kaya,Seda Guney,Ahmet Turan Isik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2369657

2024-06-26

Applied Neuropsychology Adult

Abstract:Introduction There is still a requirement for concise, practical scales that can be readily incorporated into everyday schedules and predict the likelihood of dementia onset in individuals without dementia. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the ANU-ADRI (Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index)-Short Form in Turkish geriatric patients.

psychology,clinical neurology

Validation and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mindful Eating Inventory in Adults

Development and validation of the mindful eating scale (mind-eat scale) in a general population

Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the eating in the absence of hunger in children and adolescents (EAH-C)

Validation of the 14-item mediterranean diet adherence screener

Behaviors scale towards sustainable nutrition: development and validity-reliability analysis

Investigation of psychometric properties of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire in Chinese adolescents and young adults using mixed methods

Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Salzburg Stress Eating Scale for children and adolescents

Turkish Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the US Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM) in University Students

Initial Validation of the Brazilian Mindful Eating Scale Among Overweight and Low-Income Women

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in Patients With Cognitive Impairment

Translation and Modification of a Mindful Eating Questionnaire for Children Assisted by Item Response Theory in Chinese Children and Adolescents

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity in Young Adult Athletes

Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale

Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study

Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Relationship Mindfulness Measure in an Emerging Adult Sample

Evaluation of the Relationships Among Mindful Eating, Environmental Beliefs, Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, and Obesity in Children

Validity and reliability of the Sustainable HEalthy Diet (SHED) index by comparison with EAT-Lancet diet, Mediterranean diet in Turkish adults

Psychometric properties of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) in Turkish adolescents

Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2) in a sample of community adults

Turkish version of a short nutrition literacy scale for young adults: cultural adaptation and validation

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Australian National University-Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI)