Will perioperative pembrolizumab treatment change perioperative treatment strategies for resectable non-small cell lung cancer?

Shuji Murakami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-578
2024-01-31
Translational Lung Cancer Research
Abstract:Shuji Murakami ^ Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan ^ ORCID: 0000-0001-5104-5493. Comment on: Wakelee H, Liberman M, Kato T, et al . Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;389:491-503. Keywords: Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (early-stage NSCLC); pembrolizumab; perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor (perioperative ICI) Submitted Sep 07, 2023. Accepted for publication Dec 18, 2023. Published online Jan 11, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-578 Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for early-stage (stages I–IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for approximately 30% of lung cancer cases. However, even with complete resection, recurrence and metastasis occur (1), especially in the more advanced stages of early lung cancer. This may be due to the presence of distant micrometastases at the time of intervention. Therefore, to improve the prognosis of early-stage NSCLC, it is important to eliminate micrometastases using more effective systemic therapies. Since the 1980s, several studies have shown that cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection in patients with early-stage NSCLC improves surgical resection outcomes and is effective in increasing the 5-year survival rate by only 5% (2), thus being established as the central standard of care for patients with pathological stages II and III NSCLC. Regarding preoperative chemotherapy, many clinical trials were stopped prematurely because of the early establishment of postoperative chemotherapy (3,4); therefore, the efficacy of the latter has not been fully evaluated. However, a meta-analysis of numerous preoperative chemotherapy trials showed that it significantly improved overall survival (OS), time to distant recurrence, and recurrence-free survival (4). Previous preoperative and postoperative meta-analyses suggest that the effects on survival are similar; therefore, it is still unclear whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be administered as adjuvant or postoperative chemotherapy for patients with resectable NSCLC. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling pathway have dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, changing the treatment framework. ICIs have produced durable responses and prolonged survival in 20–30% of patients with advanced NSCLC (5,6). These results have driven the rapid expansion of ICI-related treatment into perioperative therapy. Regarding perioperative treatment, preoperative ICI could maximize the efficacy of immunotherapy when the primary tumor is still present and has a high neoantigen burden. The presence of the whole tumor enables a broad T cell response owing to exposure to a large repertoire of tumor antigens (7). This approach theoretically allows intact tumors, lymphatic vessels, and draining lymph nodes to successfully prime T cells, efficiently activate systemic tumor immunity, and control small distant metastases (8). ICIs can be used in combination with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy to enhance neoantigen release and promote a more robust immune response. This provides reason to expect a difference in the therapeutic effect of ICIs between postoperative and preoperative use, with interest in preoperative treatment growing once again. However, preoperative treatment has limitations that must be overcome. There are several risks, including missed resection in patients whose tumors have not responded to treatment and have progressed and the possibility that adverse events will complicate the continuation of subsequent treatment, including surgery. Losing the opportunity for surgery in operable lung cancer patients should be minimized. Therefore, the treatment strategy must balance the potential benefits and disadvantages of preoperative treatment. For neoadjuvant ICIs as the standard of care, they must be effective (pathologic regression) after induction therapy, safe, have few treatment-related serious adverse events (grade 3 or higher), have a low incidence of unresectable cases after induction therapy, and have little impact on perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recently, Wakelee et al. reported a phase III study of perioperative pembrolizumab for early-stage NSCLC (KEYNOTE-671) (9). It was a double-blind phase III trial that enrolled patients with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC. In this study, 797 patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy [cisplatin with gemcitabine (squamous histology type) or pemetrexed (non-squamous histology type)] plus pembrolizumab or placebo for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 13 cycles. The dual primary endpoints wer -Abstract Truncated-
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?