Comments on junk DNA : is it really junk ?

Y. Huen
Abstract:Only 3% of the DNA in human cells codes for protein manufacture. The remaining 97% is termed " nonsense " or " junk " DNA. Curiously the proof that junk DNA is not junk did not come from biochemistry but from pure mathematics. This is done using the general theory of first order compressibility of k-nary strings. Since DNA-sequences are 4-nary strings and are quasi-periodic, certain properties must comply with the above theory in addition to constraints imposed by biomolecular theory. It can be proved mathematically that genomes are never stable and that the control mechanism for genome stabilisation is by increasing the lengths of introns or junk DNA's. Furthermore, it can also be proved that absolute equilibrium in a genome is an unattainable state. Perpetual teetering at the edge of chaos or disequilibrium is what makes biological evolution possible. Equilibrium will spell stagnation and ultimately extinction.
Biology,Mathematics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?