Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification

MW Chase, Douglas E Soltis, PS Soltis, PJ Rudall, MF Fay, WH Hahn, S Sullivan, J Joseph, M Molvray, PJ Kores, TJ Givnish, KJ Sytsma, JC Pires, KL Wilson, DA Morrison
2000-05-19
Abstract:Since the time of the last major conference on monocotyledons, great progress in understanding of their higher level relationships has taken place; much of this is due an enormous increase in the amount of DNA sequence data collected. We present here the results of a combined analysis of three genes, two plastid and one nuclear, for 126 monocots, as well as 22 magnoliid outgroups. These trees are highly congruent with previous higherlevel analyses of plastid rbcL sequences, but with one significant difference: much of the monocot tree is well supported. Based on the results of a similar three-gene study encompassing all seed plants, the monocots are weakly supported as a member of a clade composed of Canellaceae-Winteraceae, Chloranthaceae, Laurales, Magnoliales and Piperales, although none of their inter-relationships receives more than 50% bootstrap support All shortest trees place the monocots as sister to the rest of the taxa. Within the strongly supported monocots, Acoraceae are well supported as the sister-group to all the rest. Alismatales (strongly supported and encompassing all alismatid families plus Araceae and Tofieldiaceae) are supported as the next diverging order, followed by Pandanales, Dioscoreales. Liliales. and finally Asparagales-commelinoids. All of these large clades have at least some bootstrap support, but their inter-relationships all receive less than 50% bootstrap support. Within the commelinoids, all shortest trees place the palms as sister to the rest, followed by Dasypogonaceae, Zmgiberales-Commelinales and Poales. All of these clades receive at least weak bootstrap support, but their inter …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?