Abstract:The DIN 92419 defines six principles for assistive systems' ergonomic design. There is, however, a lack of measurement tools to evaluate assistive systems considering these principles. Consequently, this study developed a measurement tool for the quantitative evaluation of the fulfilment of each principle for assistive systems. A systematic literature review was performed to identify dimensions belonging to the principles, identify how previous research evaluated these dimensions, and develop a measurement tool for assistive systems. Findings show that scales commonly used for evaluating assistive systems disregard several aspects highlighted as relevant by research, implying the need for considering the DIN 92419 principles. Based on established scales and theoretical findings, a questionnaire, and a checklist for evaluating assistive systems were developed. The work provides a grounding for measuring relevant aspects of assistive systems. Further development is needed to substantiate the reliability and validity of the proposed questionnaire scales and items. Practitioner Summary: Responding to the gap of a holistic measurement tool to evaluate assistive systems, a systematic literature review was performed considering the DIN 92419 principles. This resulted in a comprehensive summary of relevant aspects of assistive systems that were made numerically measurable, which proposes better criteria to assess assistive systems. Abbreviations: IoT: internet of things; RQ: research question; TAM: technology acceptance model; UTAUT: unified theory of acceptance and use of technology; AaaS: adaptivity as a service; SAR: socially assistive robots; SEEV: salience, effort, expectancy, and value; PRISMA: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; HMI: human-machine interaction; HRI: human-robot interaction; BCI: brain-computer interface; QUEST: Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology; SUS: system usability scale; NASA-TLX: NASA task load index; ATD PA: assistive technology device predisposition assessment; Wheel Con: wheelchair use confidence scale; CATOM: caregiver assistive technology outcome measure; CBI: caregiver burden inventory; RoSAS: robotic social attributes scale; WheelCon: wheelchair use confidence scale; IMI: intrinsic motivation inventory; ATD PA: assistive technology device predisposition assessment; UEQ: User experience questionnaire; USEUQ: usefulness satisfaction and ease of use questionnaire; USPW: usability scale for power wheelchairs; UES: user engagement scale; SUTAQ: service user technology acceptability questionnaire; QUEAD: questionnaire for the evaluation of physical assistive devices; FATCAT: functional assessment tool for cognitive assistive technology; SE-HRI: human-robot interaction scale; SART: situation awareness rating technique; TSQ;WT: tele-healthcare satisfaction questionnaire-wearable technology; PAIF: participants' assessment of the intervention's feasibility; SWAT: subjective workload assessment technique; MARS-HA: measure of audiologic rehabilitation self-efficacy for hearing aids; IOI-HA: International outcome inventory for hearing aids; FMA: functional mobility assessment; FBIS: familiarity and behavioural intention survey; CSQ: client satisfaction questionnaire; COPM: canadian occupational performance measure; ATCS: assistive technology confidence scale; ACC: acceptance; SSP: safety, security and privacy; OPT: optimisation of resultant internal load; CTRL: controllability; ADAPT: adaptability; P&I: perceptibility and identifiability; AAL: ambient assisted living; VR: virtual reality; AS: assistive system; WEIRD: Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic; HEART: horizontal european activities of rehabilitation technology; AAATE: advancement of assistive technology in Europe's; GATE: global collaboration on assistive technology; ATA-C: assistive technology assessment toolkit.

The Development and Validation of the Technology-Supported Reflection Inventory

Further development of the reflective practice questionnaire

Measuring deliberate reflection in residents: validation and psychometric properties of a measurement tool

Development and Initial Validation of the Counselor Self-Reflection Inventory for Counselors and Counselors-in-Training

Supporting reflection in technology-enhanced learning

Measuring Work Demands and Resources of Digitalisation: The ICT Resources and Stressors Scale

Creating and Validating Rapid Assessment Instruments for Practice and Research: Part 1

Empowering Educators to Sustain Reflective Teaching Practices: The Validation of Instruments

Development and Validation of the Self-Efficacy in Human-Robot-Interaction Scale (SE-HRI)

Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419

Development and Validation of the System Trustworthiness Scale

Development and validation of the Informal Supporter Readiness Inventory (ISRI)

Artificial intelligence self-efficacy: Scale development and validation

Scaling the Creative Self: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Short Scale of Creative Self

Development and Validation of the Attitudes towards Social Robots Scale

A Novel Instrument for Measuring Older People’s Attitudes Toward Technology (TechPH): Development and Validation

A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale

Development and psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Stroke Inventory

Development and Testing of the Relational and Structural Components of Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale

Developing a scale to explore self-regulatory approaches to assessment and feedback with academics in higher education

Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation