Abstract:This paper is included in the First Monday Special Issue: Music and the Internet, published in July 2005. Special Issue editor David Beer asked authors to submit additional comments regarding their articles. Since this paper was first published in 2002 there has been a constant stream of litigation surrounding P2P in the US and in other jurisdictions. In the United States, the District Court and the Court of Appeals controversially held that Grokster was not liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement. Justice Thomas of the Federal Circuit observed: "We live in a quicksilver technological environment with courts ill-suited to fix the flow of internet innovation." The United States Supreme Court is due to hear an appeal by copyright owners against the Grokster decision in 2005. In Australia, litigation was initiated against Sharman License Holdings, LEF Interactive and Brilliant Digital Entertainment, as the controllers of the peer to peer network Kazaa. Again, media owners have emphasized that the network is a pirate bazaar. Global legal forum shopping is one of the intriguing aspects of P2P. We see the arguments of both sides, originally developed specifically for US deliberation manifest across the globe. The Media naively ask whether there is any point in the Australian court considering these issues, given the litigation ongoing in the US. Here the US is seen as the world leader for legal ideas surrounding P2P, with the currency in ideas about technology, innovation and growing the global information economy clouding appreciation of national sovereignty and the distinctiveness of local jurisprudence. This context makes an appreciation of the cultural uniqueness of the US views all the more important. Rip, Mix, Burn: The Politics of Peer to Peer and Copyright Law by Kathy Bowrey and Matthew Rimmer Whereas Lessig's recent work engages with questions of culture and creativity in society, this paper looks at the role of culture and creativity in the law. The paper evaluates the Napster, DeCSS, Felten and Sklyarov litigation in terms of the new social, legal, economic and cultural relations being produced. This involves a deep discussion of law's economic relations, and the implications of this for litigation strategy. The paper concludes with a critique of recent attempts to define copyright law in terms of first amendment rights and communicative freedom.

Por una cultura libre: Cómo los grandes medios usan la tecnología y las leyes para encerrar la cultura y controlar la creatividad

Reasonable Use and Management of the Copyright in Digital Library

Digital media and intellectual property

Book to the Future - a manifesto for book liberation

Desafíos de la investigación sobre cultura digital en américa latina. encuadres para un debate epistemológico

Rip, Mix, Burn: The politics of peer to peer and copyright law (originally published in August 2002)

“LOS NUEVOS, NUEVOS OBJETOS” Y LA MATERIALIDAD DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN DE LA CULTURA DIGITAL EN AMÉRICA LATINA. ENTREVISTA AL DR. CARLOS SCOLARI

Toward Cultural Democracy: Digital First Sale Doctrine and Copyright

Kant, Copyright and Communicative Freedom

Technology and the cultural appropriation of music

La Crisis De Credibilidad De La Gestión Institucional: Hacia La Generación De Confianza En La Era Del Ciberespacio

Between Copyright and Computer Science: The Law and Ethics of Generative AI

Ciudadanías Digitales: Perspectivas Desde Los Medios, El Periodismo Y La Educomunicación

Mind the Gap! How the Digital Turn Upsets Intellectual Property

Copyright and Piracy: Copyright infringement, ‘free-riding’ and the lifeworld

La Vida Conectiva. Las Redes Digitales Como Espejos Sociotécnicos De Iberoamérica

Apuntes sobre teoría del comportamiento corrupto: nociones cibernéticas e informáticas para una actualización de la ecuación de Klitgaard

The economics of copyright in the digital age

Digital Platforms and Infrastructure in the Realm of Culture

Ethical and Legal Use of Information by University Students: The Core Content of a Training Program

La crisis de credibilidad de las organizaciones periodísticas: