Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Algorithmic Personalized Pricing with the Right to Explanation

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

Regulatory Instruments for Fair Personalized Pricing

An Evolutionary Game-Based Regulatory Path for Algorithmic Price Discrimination in E-Commerce Platforms

Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law

Behavior-based algorithmic pricing

The Impact of Algorithmic Price Discrimination on Consumers' Perceived Betrayal

Denied by an (Unexplainable) Algorithm: Teleological Explanations for Algorithmic Decisions Enhance Customer Satisfaction

Big Data and Personalized Pricing

Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR

Protecting Consumers Against Personalized Pricing: A Stopping Time Approach

Algorithm Interpretation Right—The First Step to Algorithmic Governance

Data Privacy and Algorithmic Inequality

Monetizing Explainable AI: A Double-edged Sword

Algorithmic Collusion and Price Discrimination: The Over-Usage of Data

Personal Data Market Optimization Pricing Model Based on Privacy Level

Unboxing the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence: Algorithmic Transparency and/or a Right to Functional Explainability

Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricing

Regulating the Big Data-Based Discriminatory Pricing in Platform Retailing: A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

On the Illegality and Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination in China's Digital Economy