Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities

Yu Zhang,Xi Chen,Yanying Mao,Chenyang Shuai,Liudan Jiao,Ya Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107705
IF: 6.9
2021-08-01
Ecological Indicators
Abstract:<p>The State Council of China initiated an air pollution prevention and control key (APPCK) city program to drive the national economic development and air pollution control since 2003. However, little known about whether the initiation is efficient. This paper examined the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency (PPCE) of 112 Chinese APPCK cities in 2003–2017 using Super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model with undesirable outputs. Results show that: (1) PPCEs of coastal cities (e.g., Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Suzhou) are much higher than those of less-developed northern cities (e.g., Jiaozuo, Anyang and Kaifeng); (2) the overall PPCE of 112 APPCK cities is relatively low and improvable; (3) the annual average growth rate of global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index is 6.3%; (4) the technological progress is a significant contributor to improve the PPCE of these cities with 3.1% global technological change. These results provide reference to not only the policy-makers of China for synergies and tradeoffs between economic development and PM2.5 pollution control but also the studies on PM2.5 pollution control efficiency in the international context.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency (PPCE) of 112 key air pollution prevention and control cities (APPCK cities) in China from 2003 to 2017, and analyze the resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution reduction potential in these cities. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Evaluate the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of 112 Chinese APPCK cities**: By using the Super - Slack - Based Measure (Super - SBM) model, the researchers quantitatively evaluated the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of these cities. 2. **Analyze the resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution reduction potential of each city**: The research not only focuses on the overall efficiency, but also deeply explores the resource allocation situation of each city and its potential in reducing PM2.5 pollution. 3. **Evaluate the total factor PM2.5 pollution control efficiency (TFP)**: Using the Global Malmquist - Luenberger (GML) productivity index, the researchers analyzed the change trend of PM2.5 pollution control efficiency among these cities in different years. ### Methodology To achieve the above - mentioned goals, the research adopted the following methods: 1. **Super - SBM model**: This model is used to quantify the relative PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of each city. The model takes into account multi - input (such as energy consumption, water resource consumption, labor force and fixed - asset investment) and multi - output (such as GDP and PM2.5 concentration), and specially deals with the undesired output (such as PM2.5 concentration). 2. **GML productivity index**: This index is used to evaluate the dynamic change of PM2.5 pollution control efficiency. By decomposing the GML index, the researchers can distinguish the influence of efficiency change and technological progress on PM2.5 pollution control efficiency. ### Data sources The data used in the research include: - **Input variables**: - Energy consumption: including all types of energy consumption in urban areas, converted into standard coal equivalent (SCE). - Water resource consumption: the total water consumption in urban areas. - Labor force: the number of employed people in urban areas. - Fixed - asset investment: the total investment amount in urban areas. - **Output variables**: - Economic output: the regional gross domestic product (GDP) in urban areas. - Undesired output: the annual average PM2.5 concentration in urban areas. The data are mainly sourced from the "China Urban Statistical Yearbook" (2004 - 2018), and the PM2.5 concentration data are from NASA's Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS). ### Main findings The research results show that: - **The PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of coastal cities is significantly higher than that of less - developed northern cities**: For example, the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of Shanghai, Guangzhou and Suzhou is much higher than that of northern cities such as Jiaozuo, Anyang and Kaifeng. - **The overall PM2.5 pollution control efficiency is relatively low and has room for improvement**: The overall PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of 112 APPCK cities is relatively low, but there is a possibility of improvement. - **The average annual growth rate of the Global Malmquist - Luenberger productivity index is about 6.3%**: Technological progress has made a significant contribution to improving the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency of these cities, and the global technological change rate is 3.1%. These findings provide important references for policy - makers and are helpful to realize the synergy between economic development and PM2.5 pollution control in cities in China and other countries.