N6-methyladenosine in 5′ UTR does not promote translation initiation

Ewelina Guca,Rodrigo Alarcon,Michael Z Palo,Leonardo Santos,Santiago Alonso-Gil,Marcos Davyt,Leonardo H F de Lima,Fanny Boissier,Sarada Das,Bojan Zagrovic,Joseph D Puglisi,Yaser Hashem,Zoya Ignatova,Michael Z. Palo,Leonardo H.F. de Lima,Joseph D. Puglisi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.028
IF: 16
2024-02-01
Molecular Cell
Abstract:The most abundant N<sup>6</sup>-methyladenosine (m<sup>6</sup>A) modification on mRNAs is installed non-stoichiometrically across transcripts, with 5' untranslated regions (5' UTRs) being the least conductive. 5' UTRs are essential for translation initiation, yet the molecular mechanisms orchestrated by m<sup>6</sup>A remain poorly understood. Here, we combined structural, biochemical, and single-molecule approaches and show that at the most common position, a single m<sup>6</sup>A does not affect translation yields, the kinetics of translation initiation complex assembly, or start codon recognition both under permissive growth and following exposure to oxidative stress. Cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the late preinitiation complex reveal that m<sup>6</sup>A purine ring established stacking interactions with an arginine side chain of the initiation factor eIF2α, although with only a marginal energy contribution, as estimated computationally. These findings provide molecular insights into m<sup>6</sup>A interactions with the initiation complex and suggest that the subtle stabilization is unlikely to affect the translation dynamics under homeostatic conditions or stress.
cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?