Abstract:The proliferation of technology has facilitated data accessibility, leading to an expansion in the range of criteria employed in decision problem design. This situation offers an advantage for making precise and rational decisions, but when it comes to managing spending, it becomes a disadvantage. Specifically, the expense of acquiring expert views utilized in the computation of criteria weights by subjective approaches experiences a substantial rise. Hence, decision-makers may employ objective methodologies to determine criterion weights. Nevertheless, objective methods provide a more limited range of choices compared to subjective methods. The study aims to utilize two widely recognized fundamental statistical approaches in order to enhance the capabilities of objective methods. One of the suggested approaches is the dissimilarity-based weighting method, which calculates the differentiation of values within the criteria. Another approach is the weighting method, which relies on the interquartile range. The methods were adapted as means of weighting criteria. Explanatory examples were provided, simulation-based comparisons were conducted, and ultimately applied to an actual data set. The data from each scenario were compared using the factorial analysis of variance method. The findings produced demonstrate that the proposed methods align with other objective methodologies. Furthermore, the proposed approaches were observed to take more time to finish the procedure compared to the Entropy and Standard Deviation methods, but less time compared to the Critic and Merec methods. Consequently, the suggested techniques are introduced as alternative approaches derived from established fundamental statistical procedures, which are straightforward to comprehend and valuable for professionals.

Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD

Basic statistical methods in determining criteria weights

A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision Criteria

Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making

Opinion Weight Criteria Method (OWCM): A New Method for Weighting Criteria With Zero Inconsistency

A Study of Decision Process in MCDM Problems with Large Number of Criteria

Sensitivity Assessment of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Chemical Engineering Optimization Applications

Simple additive weighting—A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods

A Novel Method for Assessing the Weight Coefficients of Criteria within the Framework of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: Measurement Relying on the Impacts of an Exponential Curve Function (MIEXCF)

Research on the Satisfaction Degree and Criteria Weight Obtaining for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problem

A model for determining weights of criteria using subjective and objective information

Supporting multi-criteria decision-making processes with unknown criteria weights

An Interval-Valued Best–Worst Method with Normal Distribution for Multi-criteria Decision-Making

A thermodynamical approach towards multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)

Extended Hellwig's Method Utilizing Entropy-Based Weights and Mahalanobis Distance: Applications in Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Education Area

A method to determine the integrated weights of cross-efficiency aggregation

A New Entropy Measurement for the Analysis of Uncertain Data in MCDA Problems Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and COPRAS Method

Weight assignment method for multiple attribute decision making with dissimilarity and conflict of belief distributions

Information-Theoretic-Entropy Based Weight Aggregation Method in Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making

CRITID: enhancing CRITIC with advanced independence testing for robust multi-criteria decision-making

A New Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Using the Dice Similarity Measure under Fermatean Fuzzy Environments