Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) – The Benefits of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Przemysław Karol Wolak,Agnieszka Strzelecka,Aneta Piotrowska - Gall,Piotr Przemysław Wolak,Ilona Piotrowska,Katarzyna Dąbrowska,Joanna Wróbel,Grażyna Nowak-Starz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S348197
2022-02-22
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Przemys&lstrokaw Karol Wolak, 1, 2 Agnieszka Strzelecka, 1 Aneta Piotrowska - Gall, 1, 2 Piotr Przemys&lstrokaw Wolak, 3 Ilona Piotrowska, 4 Katarzyna D&aogonbrowska, 5 Joanna Wróbel, 1 Gra&zdotyna Nowak-Starz 1 1 Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, Kielce, Poland; 2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology and Traumatology, Regional Hospital in Kielce, Kielce, Poland; 3 City Hospital of Zabrze, Zabrze, Poland; 4 Regional Hospital in Kielce, Kielce, Poland; 5 Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, &Lstrokód&zacute, Poland Correspondence: Przemys&lstrokaw Karol Wolak, Tel +48 501 525 549, Email Introduction: The laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children using the PIRS technique is a well-established method. However, there are still opinions that this method does not bring more benefits than open surgery. Purpose: The study aims to demonstrate the benefits of laparoscopic technique over conventional, open techniques. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that included children aged 0– 18 treated using the PIRS technique in 2008– 2016. The control group consisted of patients treated with the traditional, open method of inguinal hernia repair. A total of 276 children were qualified for laparoscopic surgery, and there were 274 patients in the control group. A full laparoscopic procedure was performed on 247 patients. Assessment of the pathology of the internal inguinal ring was done in all patients during the laparoscopic procedure. Intraoperatively 79 children had bilateral inguinal hernia diagnosed, 133 right-sided inguinal herniae, and 57 left-sided inguinal herniae. The occurrence of hernia was not confirmed in 7 children, whereas 53 patients had open contralateral patent processus vaginalis. In a case of contralateral patent processus vaginalis, the repair was performed using the PIRS method. Results: The recurrence of the inguinal hernia was observed in 10 children in the laparoscopic group and in 5 cases in control group. The duration of the procedure was noted and compared to open inguinal hernia repair. There was a statistically shorter duration of the laparoscopic method. In the control group, there were 16 patients with a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia. Conclusion: The laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with a better assessment of hernia pathology, shorter operative time, and lower risk of contralateral hernia repair. Keywords: inguinal hernia, PIRS, children, laparoscopy Inguinal hernia in children is one of the most common conditions faced by pediatric surgeons in everyday practice. It is estimated that the possibility of occurrence of inguinal hernia is 0.8–4.4% of the total number of children. 1 The majority of children report congenital oblique inguinal hernia. Even though inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed procedures in pediatric surgery, there is still a lack of consensus on which technique: laparoscopic or open, is superior. There are plenty of technical variations of laparoscopic hernia repair, which differ in their outcomes. The laparoscopic approach comes with obvious advantages like better visualization of the inguinal canal, better cosmesis, faster recovery, and the ability to detect contralateral patent processus vaginalis. There are fewer technical variations in open inguinal hernia repair, and their outcomes differ significantly. Despite the described benefits of the laparoscopic approach, open inguinal hernia repair is still preferable in most pediatric surgery centers. There were several systematic reviews published comparing laparoscopic versus open repair. However, a limited number of studies provide level 1a evidence, and many outcome parameters have not been addressed. As a result, the debate about the best treatment strategies is still ongoing. 2–6 One of the most commonly used laparoscopic approaches in Poland is the percutaneous internal ring suturing technique (PIRS) proposed by Patkowski in 2006. 7,8 Our analysis addresses parameters that make this approach superior to conventional methods used in inguinal hernia repair in children. All patients presenting with a complaint of inguinal hernia were interviewed for the clinical symptoms and examined. The examination included a physical exam, and abdominal and inguinal ultrasonography, which neither confirmed nor excluded the possibility of hernia's occurrence. An experienced surgeon was proposing surgical treatment in cases with evident inguinal hern -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services