Abstract:The objective of this clinical study was to compare the whitening/bleaching efficacy of two marketed in-office whitening systems: Discus Dental Zoom! Chairside System (25% hydrogen peroxide whitening gel) and Opalescence Xtra Boost Kit (38% hydrogen peroxide whitening gel), using the Vita Shade Guide and chromameter measurements. The study was an examiner-blind, parallel group, randomized and controlled clinical trial conducted in a dental setting. All subjects signed a study consent form prior to admission and were given Crest Regular Toothpaste and an Oral-B 40 straight-handle toothbrush to use during the study. Subjects received a supragingival prophylaxis followed by a screening eligibility Vita Shade assessment from which 22 subjects were selected. At baseline, all six maxillary anterior teeth were assessed with the Vita Shade Guide. Chromameter measurements were taken on either the right maxillary central or left maxillary central (tooth No. 8 or tooth No. 9). Subjects were assigned to one of two treatment groups, and had three applications of their assigned product. Following completion of the treatment phase, and on post-treatment Days 2 and 7, a visual examination of the condition of the oral soft tissues, together with a Vita Shade assessment on maxillary anterior teeth, a chromameter reading and a questionnaire regarding tooth sensitivity were completed. At the termination of the study, the statistical analysis of the Vita Shade scores indicated that both products significantly (p < 0.0001) lightened the color of the teeth. The average improvement was between 6 and 9 shade changes. Additionally, the Zoom! Chairside System was significantly better than the Opalescense Xtra Boost Kit at all time points: post-treatment (p < 0.0001); Day 2 (p < 0.004); Day 7 (p < 0.003). This difference was between 1 and 2 shade changes. The chromameter readings showed a significant difference in the overall color change (delta E) to a lighter color for both the Zoom! Chairside System and the Opalescence Xtra Boost Kit. Using delta E, the Zoom! Chairside System was directionally better than the Opalescense Xtra Boost Kit at Day 2 (p < 0.08), and significantly better at Day 7 (p < 0.025). Analysis of the composite parameters of delta E (L*, a*, b*) showed that no differences could be detected in the a* (redness) parameter. Changes were observed in the L* (brightness) and b* (yellow) parameters which paralleled the delta E differences. There were no significant differences in induced sensitivity between whitening systems at any time point.

Bleaching Gels and Light‐Emitting Diodes: Comparison of Tooth Color Change

Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light

Evaluation of tooth color change after a bleaching process with different lasers

Influence of Different Illuminants on Spectrophotometric Tooth Color Determination

Clinical comparison of diode laser- and LED-activated tooth bleaching: 9-month follow-up

An In-Vitro Study on the Impact of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) and Laser-Activated Bleaching Techniques on the Color Change of Artificially Stained Teeth at Varying Time Intervals

Correlation between patient satisfaction and color changes after tooth bleaching

[Assessment of tooth bleaching efficacy with spectrophotometer].

Digital Photocolorimetric Analysis of In Vitro Tooth Color Changes

Subjective and photometric determination of bleaching outcomes

Comparison of Tooth Color and Enamel and Dentinal Thickness between Orthodontically Treated and Untreated Individuals

Colorimetric Comparison of Internal Bleaching with and without Removing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) on Induced Coronal Tooth Discoloration by MTA

Effects of online marketplace-sourced over-the-counter tooth whitening products on the colour, microhardness, and surface topography of enamel: an in vitro study

Biomimetic Whitening Effect of Polyphosphate-Bleaching Agents on Dental Enamel

Color Change after 25% Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching with Photoactivation: A Methodological Assessment Using Spectrophotometer versus Digital Photographs

The Efficacy of At-home, In-office, and Combined Bleaching Regimens: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Color change of shade guides with gingiva - indicator

A Comparative Evaluation of Chemically Activated, Lightactivated and Laser-activated Tooth Bleaching Systems on Whitening Efficacy and Effect on Enamel Surface Texture: An in vitro Study

Clinical study to compare two in-office (chairside) whitening systems

Effectiveness of Three Bleaching Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparative Effects of Three Bleaching Techniques on Tooth Discoloration Caused by Tea