Telemedical Support Using Smartphones for Spine Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Fabian Sommer,Francois Waterkeyn,Ibrahim Hussain,Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez,Jacob Goldberg,Alaaeldin Azmi Ahmad,Massimo Balsano,Sertac Kirnaz,Hamisi Shabani,Sam Haber,Vincent Sullivan,Amanda Ng,Pravesh Gadjradj,Roger Härtl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0250
Abstract:Objective: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges compared to industrialized nations, most notably in regard to the health care system. Patients often have to travel long distances to receive medical care with few reliable transportation mechanisms. In time-critical emergencies, this is a significant disadvantage. One specialty that is particularly affected by this is spine surgery. Within this field, traumatic injuries and acutely compressive pathologies are often time-critical. Increasing global networking capabilities through internet access offers the possibility for telemedical support in remote regions. Recently, high-performance cameras and processors became available in commercially available smartphones. Due to their wide availability and ease of use, this could provide a unique opportunity to offer telemedical support in LMICs. Methods: We conducted a feasibility study with a neurosurgical institution in east Africa. To ensure telemedical support, a commercially available smartphone was selected as the experimental hardware. Preoperatively, resolution, contrast, brightness, and color reproduction were assessed under theoretical conditions using a test chart. Intraoperatively, the image quality was assessed under different conditions. In the first step, the instrumentation table was displayed, and the mentor surgeon marked an instrument that the mentee surgeon should recognize correctly. In the next evaluation step, the surgical field was shown on film and the mentor surgeon marked an anatomical structure, and in the last evaluation step, the screen of the X-ray machine was captured, and the mentor surgeon again marked an anatomical structure. Subjective image quality was rated by two independent reviewers using the similar modified Likert scale as before on a scale of 1-5, with 1 indicating inadequate quality and 5 indicating excellent quality. Results: The image quality during the video calls was rated as sufficient overall. When evaluating the test charts, a quality of 97% ± 5 on average was found for the chart with the white background and a quality of 84% ± 5 on average for the chart with the black background. The color reproduction, the contrast, and the reproduction of brightness were rated excellent. Intraoperatively, the visualization of the instrument table was also rated excellent. Visualization of the operative site was rated 1.5 ± 0.5 on average and it was not possible to recognize relevant anatomical structures with the required confidence for surgical procedures. Image quality of the X-ray screen was rated 1.5 ± 0.9 on average. Conclusion: Current generation smartphones have high imaging performance, high computing power, and excellent connectivity. However, relevant anatomical structures during spine surgery procedures and on the X-ray screen in the operating room could not be identified with reliability to provide adequate surgical support. Nevertheless, our study showed the potential in smartphones supporting surgical procedures in LMICs, which could be helpful in other surgical fields.