Abstract:Over the past decades, benefiting from the development of computing capacity and the free access to Landsat and Sentinel imagery, several fine-resolution global land cover (GLC) products (with a resolution of 10 m or 30 m) have been developed (GlobeLand30, FROM-GLC30, GLC_FCS30, FROM-GLC10, European Space Agency (ESA) WorldCover and ESRI Land Cover). However, there is still a lack of consistency analysis or comprehensive accuracy assessment using a common validation dataset for these GLC products. In this study, a novel stratified random sampling GLC validation dataset (SRS_Val) containing 79,112 validation samples was developed using a visual interpretation method, significantly increasing the number of samples of heterogeneous regions and rare land-cover types. Then, we quantitatively assessed the accuracy of these six GLC products using the developed SRS_Val dataset at global and regional scales. The results reveal that ESA WorldCover achieved the highest overall accuracy (of 70.54% ± 9%) among the global 10 m land cover products, followed by FROM-GLC10 (68.95% ± 8%) and ESRI Land Cover (58.90% ± 7%) and that GLC_FCS30 had the best overall accuracy (of 72.55% ± 9%) among the global 30 m land cover datasets, followed by GlobeLand30 (69.96% ± 9%) and FROM-GLC30 (66.30% ± 8%). The mapping accuracy of the GLC products decreased significantly with the increased heterogeneity of landscapes, and all GLC products had poor mapping accuracies in countries with heterogeneous landscapes, such as some countries in Central and Southern Africa. Finally, we investigated the consistency of six GLC products from the perspective of area distributions and spatial patterns. It was found that the area consistencies between the five GLC products (except ESRI Land Cover) were greater than 85% and that the six GLC products showed large discrepancies in area consistency for grassland, shrubland, wetlands and bare land. In terms of spatial patterns, the totally inconsistent pixel proportions of the 10 m and 30 m GLC products were 23.58% and 14.12%, respectively, and these inconsistent pixels were mainly distributed in transition zones, complex terrains regions, heterogeneous landscapes, or mixed land-cover types. Therefore, the SRS_Val dataset well supports the quantitative evaluation of fine-resolution GLC products, and the assessment results provide users with quantitative metrics to select GLC products suitable for their needs.

Diagnosis of the accuracy of land cover classification using bootstrap resampling

Retrieval of forest growing stock volume by two different methods using Landsat TM images

METHODS AND ACCURACY ASSESSMENT FOR LAND USE AND COVER CLASSIFICATION BASED ON MEDIUM RESOLUTION REMOTELY SENSED DATA

Classification Efficacy Using K-Fold Cross-Validation and Bootstrapping Resampling Techniques on the Example of Mapping Complex Gully Systems

Multi-scale accuracy assessment of land cover datasets based on histo-variograms

Assessing the Accuracy and Consistency of Six Fine-Resolution Global Land Cover Products Using a Novel Stratified Random Sampling Validation Dataset

Accuracy Assessment of the FROM-GLC30 Land Cover Dataset Based on Watershed Sampling Units: A Continental-Scale Study

Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China

An Integrated Land Cover Mapping Method Suitable for Low-Accuracy Areas in Global Land Cover Maps

Assessing the Accuracy of Multi-Temporal GlobeLand30 Products in China Using a Spatiotemporal Stratified Sampling Method

Accuracy Assessment of High-Resolution Globally Available Open-Source DEMs Using ICESat/GLAS over Mountainous Areas, A Case Study in Yunnan Province, China

Assessing Land Cover Classification Accuracy: Variations in Dataset Combinations and Deep Learning Models

Spatial Consistency and Accuracy Analysis of Multi-Source Land Cover Products on the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau, China

The Illusion of Success: Test Set Disproportion Causes Inflated Accuracy in Remote Sensing Mapping Research

Evaluation of Sampling and Cross-Validation Tuning Strategies for Regional-Scale Machine Learning Classification

Research on the Accuracy of TM Images Land-Use Classification Based on QUEST Decision Tree: A Case Study of Lijiang in Yunnan

Mapping of Land Cover Over Highly Heterogeneous Areas in Yunnan Province With Active and Passive Remotely Sensed Data

A more effective approach for species-level classifications using multi-source remote sensing data: Validation and application to an arid and semi-arid grassland

The Reference Data for Accuracy Assessment of the Global Forest Watch Tree Cover 2000 in China

Stratified even sampling method for accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification: a case study of Beijing, China

Cross-validation methods for multi-source precipitation datasets over the sparse-gauge region: applicability and uncertainty