Changes in total and per-capital ecosystem service value in response to land-use land-cover dynamics in north-central Ethiopia

Emiru Birhane,Emnet Negash,Tesfaye Getachew,Hailemariam Gebrewahed,Eskinder Gidey,Mewcha Amha Gebremedhin,Paidamwoyo Mhangara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57151-6

IF: 4.6

2024-03-20

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Ecosystems provide a wide range of services crucial for human well-being and decision-making processes at various levels. This study analyzed the major land cover types of north-central Ethiopia and their impact on total and per-capita ecosystem service value (ESV). The ESV was estimated using the benefit-transfer method along the established global and local coefficient values for the periods 1973, 1986, 2001, 2016, and 2024. The findings show that agricultural lands continued to expand at a rate of 563.4 ha year −1 , at the expense of forests and grasslands. As a result, the total ESV of the study area declined from 61.03 million and 43.69 million, respectively. The ESV per capita was also diminished by 257 (40.6%), respectively. However, land-cover improvement during the period 2001–2016 enhanced the total and per capita ESV in the study area. Therefore, potential future research may be required to develop a valid approach for assessing the robustness and sensitivity of value coefficients for the valuation of the ESV at the landscape level.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to study the impact of land cover changes on the value of ecosystem services (ESV) in the Borena area of north-central Ethiopia. Specifically, the paper explores how changes in different land cover types from 1973 to 2024 affect the total ESV and per capita ESV.

Main findings include:
1. Continuous expansion of agricultural land, leading to a reduction in forest and grassland areas.
2. Total ESV decreased from $101.4 million in 1973 to $47.08 million in 2024 (using global coefficients), while using local conservative coefficients, it decreased from $60.08 million to $43.69 million.
3. The ESV of vegetated forests is the highest, while the ESV of bare land and residential areas is the lowest.
4. Between 2001 and 2016, ESV showed some recovery due to vegetation restoration, but overall, it still exhibited a declining trend.
5. Population growth and human activities are the main reasons for the decline in ESV.

This study helps raise public awareness of the costs associated with converting natural landscapes to other land uses and provides support for sustainable policy-making.