Gender Differences in Faculty Perceptions of Mentorship and Sponsorship

Christina M. Cutter,Kent A. Griffith,Isis H. Settles,Abigail J. Stewart,Eve A. Kerr,Eva L. Feldman,Reshma Jagsi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55663
2024-02-13
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:This survey study examines gender differences in mid- to senior-career faculty experiences of receiving and providing mentorship and sponsorship during early career development.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper explores the perception of mentorship and sponsorship in the academic medical field in relation to gender differences. The study focuses on faculty members in the mid to senior stages of their careers who have received structured guidance early in their careers and are now able to reflect on their experiences. The research findings suggest that despite a greater awareness of the importance of mentorship and sponsorship, there is still a lack of understanding regarding the experiences and perspectives of senior faculty in this regard. The paper conducted a survey among individuals who were awarded the National Institutes of Health K08 or K23 career development grants between 2006 and 2009 to collect information about their experiences with mentorship and sponsorship, as well as their perceptions of the costs and benefits of these relationships. The study found that women were less likely to receive high-profile opportunities such as invitations to speak at national conferences or write editorials through sponsorship. Additionally, men were more likely to perceive organizational recognition, loyal support from mentees, and the opportunity to relive their own lives through mentoring as benefits of mentorship, while women were less likely to see the benefits of establishing mentorship relationships with individuals of different genders due to associated risks. The research results reveal the perceived costs and benefits of gender differences in developmental relationships and indicate that gender differences in the early stages of careers may persist among senior faculty. The paper highlights the need for better institutional support to promote mentorship and sponsorship in academic medicine, including compensation for time investment, and emphasizes the need to address concerns regarding male mentorship of female mentees in order to maintain vibrancy and fairness in the workforce.