Comparative study of lignin stabilizing mechanisms in soil aggregates at virgin mixed broadleaf-pine forest and secondary broadleaf forest at Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, Northeast China

Yue Feng,Shijie Han,Yingqi Wei,Jianzhang Xiao,Shicong Geng,Yue Gu,Yue Zhang,Wei Chen,Junhui Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106665
IF: 6.9
2020-10-01
Ecological Indicators
Abstract:<p>The variation of soil organic carbon (SOC) stability is independent of the amount of SOC in the soil. For predicting the conservation of soil carbon in different forest ecosystems, it is crucial to investigate the mechanisms of plant derived residues allocation and stabilization in soil aggregates in different forest ecosystems. The role of aggregate protection in SOC sequestration (using lignin as a biochemical indicator) requires understanding of the interaction of many factors. We studied aggregate proportion, SOC amount and lignin phenol contents in the soil fractions from 0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm layers in a virgin mixed broadleaf-Korean pine (BK) and secondary broadleaf <em>Betula-Populus</em> (BP) stands at Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, Northeastern China. Macroaggregates had higher lignin contents compared to the bulk soil in both BK and BP. The SOC and lignin contents in bulk soil and aggregates obviously declined with soil deepening in the two stands. BK exhibited more protected lignin in aggregates compared to the same particles from BP. The results suggested that the aggregates have limited capability to sequestrate more carbon, which causes carbon loss in the soil particles with soil depth increment in the secondary broadleaf forest. Stable lignin sequestration was achieved via effective aggregate protection in BK, while lignin occlusion was mainly regulated by the importation of plant residues into the topsoil of BP.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: to explore the influence mechanism of soil aggregates on lignin stability in the original mixed broad - leaved Korean pine forest (BK) and secondary broad - leaved forest (BP) in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, and the sequestration and stabilization mechanisms of soil organic carbon (SOC) in different forest types as the soil depth increases. ### Specific problem decomposition: 1. **SOC sequestration and lignin stability**: Study the role of soil aggregates in SOC sequestration and analyze the stability of lignin as a biochemical indicator in soil particles. 2. **Differences in different forest types**: Compare the differences in soil aggregate distribution, SOC content and lignin content between the original mixed broad - leaved Korean pine forest (BK) and the secondary broad - leaved forest (BP). 3. **Influence of soil depth**: Explore the change rules and influencing factors of soil aggregate proportion, SOC content and lignin content as the soil depth increases. 4. **Lignin degradation level**: Evaluate the degradation level and stability of SOC in soil aggregates by measuring lignin oxidation products (such as vanillyl, syringyl and cinnamyl units). --- ### Core hypotheses of the paper: 1. As the proportion of large aggregates increases, SOC sequestration will increase, and large aggregates may contain more SOC and less decomposed lignin. 2. In the BK forest, large aggregates show excellent lignin protection ability through fine roots and coniferous plant residues; while in the BP forest, the input of easily decomposable plant residues leads to more microbe - related SOC concentrated in the silt and clay components. 3. In the BK and BP forests, the protection mechanisms of soil aggregates for SOC are differently regulated by root expansion, microbial degradation and plant residue composition. --- ### Scientific research significance: By studying the protection effects of soil aggregates on SOC and lignin in different forest types, we can better understand the mechanisms of soil carbon cycle in forest ecosystems and provide a scientific basis for restoring temperate forests. At the same time, this study helps to reveal the differences in soil carbon sequestration between secondary forests and primary forests, and provides support for carbon management strategies in the context of global climate change.