Global production networks meets evolutionary economic geography

Neil Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2316175

IF: 4.595

2024-03-10

Regional Studies

Abstract:Two of the canonical approaches in regional studies are global production networks (GPNs) and evolutionary economic geography (EEG). Recent geopolitical and economic events have shown the importance of both theories in explaining regional economic change. Yet they remain discrete and separate, and there is now consensus that, together, they could explain more. A vibrant debate on the relationship between these two approaches is needed, starting with identifying unifying themes and areas of analytical difference, to develop a research agenda for future work which can better explain regional change.

economics,environmental studies,regional & urban planning,geography

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how two classic but relatively independent theoretical frameworks in regional studies, namely Global Production Networks (GPNs) and Evolutionary Economic Geography (EEG), can be combined to better explain regional economic changes. Specifically, the paper emphasizes the following points:

1. **The need for theoretical integration**: Although GPNs and EEG each have important contributions in explaining regional economic changes, they are usually studied and developed independently. The paper points out that by identifying the unifying themes and analyzing the differences between these two theories, a more comprehensive research agenda can be developed, thereby more effectively explaining regional economic changes.

2. **Coping with current economic challenges**: The paper mentions that the current world is experiencing multiple challenges such as geopolitical tensions, net - zero emission targets, and technological changes. These challenges highlight the relevance and necessity of GPNs and EEG theories. For example, geopolitical tensions force multinational companies to reconsider their supply chain strategies, and evolutionary economic geography provides an important perspective for understanding the success or failure of these policy designs.

3. **The combination of theory and practice**: The paper explores how to guide practical policy - making through theoretical integration, especially in promoting regional economic development, reducing inequality, and promoting low - carbon transformation. The author believes that the market and the private sector are often slow - acting and risk - averse in应对 these challenges, so active intervention and support at the national level are required.

4. **Future research directions**: The paper proposes that in order to keep GPNs and EEG theories relevant and practical, common ground between the two needs to be found and new research areas explored. This will not only help deepen the understanding of existing theories but also promote the cross - integration of knowledge, providing new perspectives and tools for explaining regional economic changes.

In summary, this paper aims to propose a more comprehensive research agenda by integrating the two theoretical frameworks of Global Production Networks and Evolutionary Economic Geography, in order to cope with the complex challenges in the current economic environment and provide theoretical support for future policy - making.