Observational Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy Models

Olga Avsajanishvili,Gennady Y. Chitov,Tina Kahniashvili,Sayan Mandal,Lado Samushia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10030122
IF: 2.8128
2024-03-04
Universe
Abstract:Scalar field φCDM models provide an alternative to the standard ΛCDM paradigm, while being physically better motivated. Dynamical scalar field φCDM models are divided into two classes: the quintessence (minimally and non-minimally interacting with gravity) and phantom models. These models explain the phenomenology of late-time dark energy. In these models, energy density and pressure are time-dependent functions under the assumption that the scalar field is described by the ideal barotropic fluid model. As a consequence of this, the equation of state parameter of the φCDM models is also a time-dependent function. The interaction between dark energy and dark matter, namely their transformation into each other, is considered in the interacting dark energy models. The evolution of the universe from the inflationary epoch to the present dark energy epoch is investigated in quintessential inflation models, in which a single scalar field plays a role of both the inflaton field at the inflationary epoch and of the quintessence scalar field at the present epoch. We start with an overview of the motivation behind these classes of models, the basic mathematical formalism, and the different classes of models. We then present a compilation of recent results of applying different observational probes to constraining φCDM model parameters. Over the last two decades, the precision of observational data has increased immensely, leading to ever tighter constraints. A combination of the recent measurements favors the spatially flat ΛCDM model but a large class of φCDM models is still not ruled out.
astronomy & astrophysics,physics, particles & fields
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the observational constraints of dynamic dark energy models. Specifically, the paper explores how to constrain the parameters of dynamic dark energy models through various astronomical observational data, especially the scalar - field ϕCDM model, the quintessence - scalar - field ϕCDM model, and the interacting dark energy (IDE) model. These models aim to explain the phenomenon of dark energy in the late universe and attempt to solve several problems existing in the standard ΛCDM model, such as the fine - tuning problem, the coincidence problem, the Hubble constant \(H_0\) tension problem, and the \(S_8\) tension problem, etc. ### Main problems of the paper 1. **Observational constraints of dynamic dark energy models**: - Constrain the parameters of dynamic dark energy models through different observational means (such as type Ia supernovae, cosmic microwave background radiation, large - scale structure, baryon acoustic oscillations, etc.). - Analyze the constraints of these observational data on different types of dynamic dark energy models (such as the quintessence model and the phantom model). 2. **Problems of the standard ΛCDM model**: - **Fine - tuning problem**: The energy density of the cosmological constant predicted by quantum field theory differs from the observed value by about 120 orders of magnitude. - **Coincidence problem**: The current density of dark energy is similar in magnitude to the density of non - relativistic matter, which is an unsolved mystery in the standard ΛCDM model. - **Hubble constant \(H_0\) tension problem**: There are significant differences in the estimates of the current Hubble constant from local measurements and cosmic microwave background radiation data. - **\(S_8\) tension problem**: The inconsistency between the Planck satellite's primordial cosmic microwave background temperature anisotropy measurements and low - redshift measurements (such as weak gravitational lensing effects and galaxy clustering). 3. **Classification and characteristics of dynamic dark energy models**: - **Quintessence model**: The range of the equation - of - state parameter \(w_\phi\) is \(-1 < w_\phi < -\frac{1}{3}\), and the kinetic term is positive. - **Phantom model**: The equation - of - state parameter \(w_\phi < -1\), and the kinetic term is negative. - **Interacting dark energy model**: Considering the mutual conversion between dark energy and dark matter can alleviate the coincidence problem and the Hubble constant \(H_0\) tension problem in the standard ΛCDM model. ### Conclusion By comprehensively analyzing various observational data in the past two decades, the paper finds that although the current observational data still tend to support the standard flat ΛCDM model, many dynamic dark energy models have not been excluded yet. In addition, recent research shows that the interacting dark energy model is more supported by the currently available observational data at a confidence level of more than 2σ. Through these analyses, the paper provides a new perspective for understanding the mechanism of the accelerated expansion of the universe and an important reference for further research on dynamic dark energy models.