Abstract:The deployment of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered prediction models in healthcare can lead to ethical concerns about their implementation and upscaling. For example, AI prediction models can hinder clinical decision-making if they advise different diagnoses or treatments by sex and gender or by race and ethnicity without clear justification. Recent guidance (such as the WHO guidance on ethics and governance of AI for health and the Dutch guideline on AI for healthcare) and legislation (such as the European Union AI Act and the White House Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI in United States) have outlined important principles for the implementation of AI, including ethical considerations 1,2 . Health systems have responded by establishing governance committees and processes to ensure the safe and equitable implementation of AI tools 3 . However, there is currently no assessment tool that can identify and mitigate ethical issues during the implementation of AI prediction models in healthcare practice, including for public health. The development and validation of AI prediction models has benefited from detailed reporting and risk-of-bias tools, such as TRIPOD+AI 4 and PROBAST (with its forthcoming AI extension) for fairness and bias control and CLAIM 5 for data privacy, security and interpretability of AI imaging studies. However, when planning the implementation of a rigorously developed and well-performing AI prediction model in healthcare practice, existing recommendations and guidance on ethics are sparse and lack operational detail. For example, the DECIDE-AI reporting guideline 6 contains a small number of ethics-related recommendations for early clinical evaluation of AI concerning equity, safety and human-AI interaction, and FUTURE-AI 7 provides recommendations based on six principles (fairness, universality, traceability, usability, robustness and explainability) in model design, development, validation and deployment. A bioethics-centric delivery science toolkit for responsible AI implementation in healthcare is needed 8 .

Achieving a Data-Driven Risk Assessment Methodology for Ethical AI

Ethical Assurance: A practical approach to the responsible design, development, and deployment of data-driven technologies

Risk as a driver for AI framework development on manufacturing

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic cyber risk analytics at the edge

Taking AI risks seriously: a new assessment model for the AI Act

Quantitative AI Risk Assessments: Opportunities and Challenges

An Ecosystem Approach to Ethical AI and Data Use: Experimental Reflections

Responsible AI in Open Ecosystems: Reconciling Innovation with Risk Assessment and Disclosure

Implementing AI Ethics in Practice: An Empirical Evaluation of the RESOLVEDD Strategy

An International Consortium for Evaluations of Societal-Scale Risks from Advanced AI

Analysing Risk-Based Approach in the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act

Trustworthiness Assurance Assessment for High-Risk AI-Based Systems

Towards a Privacy and Security-Aware Framework for Ethical AI: Guiding the Development and Assessment of AI Systems

Approaching Emergent Risks: An Exploratory Study into Artificial Intelligence Risk Management within Financial Organisations

Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey

Ethicara for Responsible AI in Healthcare: A System for Bias Detection and AI Risk Management

Ethical and Scalable Automation: A Governance and Compliance Framework for Business Applications

Integrating ESG and AI: A Comprehensive Responsible AI Assessment Framework

An ethics assessment tool for artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare: CARE-AI

Good Intentions, Risky Inventions: A Method for Assessing the Risks and Benefits of AI in Mobile and Wearable Uses

Challenges and efforts in managing AI trustworthiness risks: a state of knowledge