Abstract:We consider two-player stochastic games played on finite graphs with reachability objectives where the first player tries to ensure a target state to be visited almost-surely (i.e., with probability 1), or positively (i.e., with positive probability), no matter the strategy of the second player. We classify such games according to the information and the power of randomization available to the players. On the basis of information, the game can be one-sided with either (a) player 1, or (b) player 2 having partial observation (and the other player has perfect observation), or two-sided with (c) both players having partial observation. On the basis of randomization, the players (a) may not be allowed to use randomization (pure strategies), or (b) may choose a probability distribution over actions but the actual random choice is external and not visible to the player (actions invisible), or (c) may use full randomization. Our main results for pure strategies are as follows. (1) For one-sided games with player 1 having partial observation we show that (in contrast to full randomized strategies) belief-based (subset-construction based) strategies are not sufficient, and we present an exponential upper bound on memory both for almostsure and positive winning strategies; we show that the problem of deciding the existence of almost-sure and positive winning strategies for player 1 is EXPTIME-complete. (2) For one-sided games with player 2 having partial observation we show that non-elementary memory is both necessary and sufficient for both almost-sure and positive winning strategies. (3) We show that for the general (two-sided) case finite-memory strategies are sufficient for both positive and almost-sure winning, and at least non-elementary memory is required. We establish the equivalence of the almost-sure winning problems for pure strategies and for randomized strategies with actions invisible. Our equivalence result exhibits serious flaws in previous results of the literature: we show a non-elementary memory lower bound for almost-sure winning whereas an exponential upper bound was previously claimed.

Merging of opinions in game-theoretic probability

Markov chain entropy games and the geometry of their Nash equilibria

Two ways game-theoretic probability can improve data analysis

New inequalities for probability functions in the two-person red-and-black game

Isomorphic Strategy Spaces in Game Theory

Bounds on the probability of radically different opinions

Bridging the Gap between Opinion Dynamics and Evolutionary Game Theory: Some Equivalence Results

Partial-Observation Stochastic Games: How to Win When Belief Fails

Variational optimization of probability measure spaces resolves the chain store paradox

A Functional Inequality and a New Class of Probabilities in the N-Person Red-and-Black Game

Imprecise probability trees: Bridging two theories of imprecise probability

Game-theoretical approach for opinion dynamics on social networks

Universal Complexity Bounds Based on Value Iteration for Stochastic Mean Payoff Games and Entropy Games

Merging Rate of Opinions via Optimal Transport on Random Measures

Strong Convergence of a Random Actions Model in Opinion Dynamics

Randomness and early termination: what makes a game exciting?

$N$-player game formulation of the majority-vote model of opinion dynamics

Merging of coherent upper conditional probabilities defined by Hausdorff outer measures

A geometric and game-theoretic study of the conjunction of possibility measures

Exciting games and Monge-Ampère equations