Priority of Mixed Diamine Ligands in Cobalt Dithiolene Complex-Catalyzed H 2 Evolution: A Theoretical Study

Xiuhua Lin,Peng Qin,Shaofei Ni,Tilong Yang,Mingde Li,Li Dang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00483
IF: 4.6
2021-04-16
Inorganic Chemistry
Abstract:Redox non-innocent metal dithiolene or diamine complexes are potential alternative catalysts in hydrogen evolution reaction and have been incorporated into 2D metal–organic frameworks to obtain unexpected electrocatalytic activity. According to an experimental study, Co-bis(dithiolene), Co-bis(diamine), and Co-dithiolene-diamine portions are considered as active sites where the generation of H<sub>2</sub> occurs and a diamine ligand is necessary for high catalytic efficiency. We are interested in the difference between these catalytic active sites, and mechanistic studies on extracted Co-bis(dithiolene), Co-bis(diamine), and Co-dithiolene-diamine complex-catalyzed hydrogen evolution reactions are carried out by using density functional methods. Our calculated results indicate that the priority of ligand mixed complexes resulted from the readily occurring protonation of diamine ligands and large electron affinity of dithiolene ligands as well as the lowest overall barrier for H<sub>2</sub> evolution.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00483?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00483</a>.Calculated Gibbs free energies for H<sub>2</sub> formation by different density functionals; computational details; calculation for redox potential, p<i>K</i>a and hydricity; Δ<i>E</i><sub>gas</sub>, Δ<i>G</i><sub>gas</sub>, Δ<i>E</i><sub>sol</sub>, Δ<i>G</i><sub>sol</sub>, p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub>, and <i>E</i><sup>0</sup> in the Co-dithiolene catalytic system, Co-diamine catalytic system, and Co-dithiolene-diamine; all possible pathways for [CoSS]<sup>−</sup>-, [CoNN]<sup>−</sup>-, and [CoSN]<sup>−</sup>-catalyzed hydrogen evolution reactions; H<sub>2</sub> evolution pathways by the proton transfer process; H<sub>2</sub> evolution pathways from <sup>2</sup>[CoSHSH]<sup>0</sup> and <sup>3</sup>[CoSHSH]<sup>−</sup>, <sup>1</sup>[CoHSHS]<sup>−</sup> and <sup>2</sup>[CoHSHS]<sup>0</sup>, <sup>2</sup>[CoNHNH]<sup>0</sup> and <sup>3</sup>[CoNHNH]<sup>−</sup>, <sup>2</sup>[CoHNHN]<sup>0</sup> and <sup>1</sup>[CoHNHN]<sup>−</sup>, <sup>4</sup>[CoSHNH]<sup>0</sup> and <sup>3</sup>[CoSHNH]<sup>−</sup>, <sup>2</sup>[CoHSNH]<sup>0</sup> and <sup>1</sup>[CoHSNH]<sup>−</sup>, and <sup>2</sup>[CoHSHN]<sup>0</sup> and <sup>3</sup>[CoHSHN]<sup>−</sup>; and calculated structures for all the intermediates in [CoSS]<sup>−</sup>, [CoNN]<sup>−</sup>, and [CoSN]<sup>−</sup> catalytic systems (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00483/suppl_file/ic1c00483_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?