Sperm DNA 5-methyl cytosine and RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation are differently affected during periods of body weight losses and body weight gain of young and mature breeding bulls
Felipe H Moura,Arturo Macias-Franco,Camilo A Pena-Bello,Evandro C Archilia,Isadora M Batalha,Aghata E M Silva,Gabriel M Moreira,Aaron B Norris,Luis F Schütz,Mozart A Fonseca
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab362
2022-02-01
Abstract:Aiming to characterize the effects of nutritional status on epigenetic markers, such as DNA 5-methyl cytosine (mC) methylation and RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation, of bovine sperm, 12 Angus × Hereford crossbred breeding bulls were submitted to nutritional changes for a period of 180 d: no change in body weight (BW) (phase 1 = 12 d), BW loss (phase 2 = 78 d), and BW gain (phase 3 = 90 d) in a repeated measures design. Animals were fed Beardless wheat (Triticum aestivum) hay and mineral mix. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC). Higher levels of RNA m6A (P = 0.004) and DNA methylation (P = 0.007) of spermatic cells were observed at phase 2 compared with phase 1. In phase 3, sperm RNA m6A methylation levels continued to be higher (P = 0.004), whereas the DNA of sperm cells was similar (P = 0.426) compared with phase 1. Growing bulls had a tendency (P = 0.109) of higher RNA m6A methylation levels than mature bulls. Phase 2 altered scrotal circumference (P < 0.001), sperm volume (P = 0.007), sperm total motility (P = 0.004), sperm progressive motility (P = 0.004), total sperm count (P = 0.049), normal sperm (P < 0.001), abnormal sperm (P < 0.001), primary sperm defects (P = 0.039), and secondary sperm defects (P < 0.001). In phase 3, bulls had scrotal circumference, sperm volume, sperm motility, sperm progressive motility, total sperm count, normal and abnormal spermatozoa, and primary and secondary spermatozoa defects similar to phase 1 (P > 0.05). Serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1 and leptin decreased during phase 2 (P = 0.010), while no differences (P > 0.05) were detected between phases 3 and 1; growing bulls tended (P = 0.102) to present higher leptin levels than mature bulls. Specific for mature bulls, DNA methylation was positively correlated with leptin concentration (0.569, P = 0.021), whereas for young bulls, DNA methylation was positively correlated with abnormal spermatozoa (0.824, P = 0.006), primary spermatozoa defect (0.711, P = 0.032), and secondary spermatozoa defect (0.661, P = 0.052) and negatively correlated with normal spermatozoa (-0.824, P = 0.006), total sperm count (-0.702, P = 0.035), and sperm concentration (-0.846, P = 0.004). There was no significant correlation (P > 0.05) between RNA m6A and hormones and semen traits. In conclusion, the nutritional status of breeding bulls alters epigenetic markers, such as DNA methylation and RNA m6A methylation, in sperm, and the impact of change seems to be age dependent. These markers may serve as biomarkers of sperm quality and fertility of bulls in the future. Detrimental effects on sperm production and seminal quality are observed at periods and places when and where environmental and nutritional limitations are a year-round reality and may carry hidden players that may influence a lifetime of underperformance.