Sacubitril/valsartan Vs Ace Inhibitor Use In Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction And New York Heart Association - 4 Symptoms; A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Bharat Rawlley,Andres Cordova Sanchez,Debanik Chaudhuri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.091
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Introduction Sacubitril/Valsartan is the first-line medication for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), evidence for which has come largely from the Paradigm-HF trial. Patients with New York Heart Association - 4 symptoms (NYHA-4) were underrepresented in this landmark trial with them being < 1% of the trial participants in both the Sacubitril/Valsartan and Enalapril group. We use a large insurance claims database to assess clinical outcomes in patients with NYHA-4 HFrEF being given Sacubitril/Valsartan vs ACE inhibitor (ACEi) Methods We queried the Trinetx US collaborative network for adult patients with a diagnosis of Systolic heart failure, NYHA-4 symptoms and further created two groups, one with at least two prescriptions for Sacubitril/Valsartan and other with at least two prescriptions for any ACEi, after 1st January 2016 and after having a diagnosis of NYHA-4 systolic heart failure. We excluded patients with a prescription for Sacubitril/Valsartan or ARBs in the ACEi group and those with a prescription for ACEi or ARBs in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group. We then conducted Propensity Score matching (PSM) for age, sex, race, diagnosis of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease to adjust for possible confounders and looked at outcome measures. Results Our initial query identified 240 patients in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group and 963 patients in the ACEi group. We were left with 237 patients in each group after PSM. A total of 76 (33%) patients in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group and 108 (46.7%) patients in the ACEi group died from any cause (HR for all-cause mortality 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.08; P > 0.05) [Figure 1]. Additionally, we found no significant differences across other clinical outcome measures namely decompensated heart failure episodes (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.51 - 2.01), End Stage Renal Disease diagnosis (RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.42 - 1.96), absolute Creatinine value >/=2.5 (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56 - 1.33), Acute Kidney Injury (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.18), Hypotension (RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.36), Cough (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.54 - 1.87) and risk of potassium > 5.5 (RR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.39 - 1.03) in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group vs ACEi group. Conclusion Sacubitril/Valsartan showed no benefit across all clinical outcome measures when compared to the use of any ACEi amongst patients with HFrEF with NYHA-4 symptoms. This encourages the use of ACE inhibitors in this population given their low-cost relative to Sacubitril/Valsartan.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?