Abstract:Effective sports training should be attuned to the athlete's specific conditionings and characteristics. In motor learning research, two often neglected factors that influence this resonance are the learner's athletic background and the structural diversity of exercises (e.g., relative similarity). In the setting of real-word training with higher external validity, this study examines the effects of three learning approaches (i.e., contextual interference (CI), differential learning (DL), and free-play control condition (CO)) on the parallel learning of handball (HB), volleyball (VB), and basketball (BB) skills, considering participants' prior sport backgrounds. Forty-five males (15 HB, 15 VB, and 15 BB players) with a mean age of 22 ± 1.4 years and at least 6 years of experience in the mastered discipline voluntarily participated in this study. A pre-post-retention test design including a 6-week-intervention program was employed. During the intervention period, participants engaged in three training sessions a week, with each one lasting approximately 80 min. Each of the three test sessions involved the execution of ten attempts of BB free-throw shooting, HB three-step goal throwing, and VB underarm passing following a blocked order. In terms of short-term (pre-post) gain, only the DL group significantly improved their performance in both non-mastered disciplines (p = 0.03, ES = 1.58 for the BB free-throw and p = 0.05, ES = 0.9 for the HB shooting tests), with a trend (ES = 0.53) towards an improvement in the performance of the mastered VB underarm-pass skill. In terms of relatively permanent gains, the CI group significantly improved their performances from pre- to retention test only in the non-mastered BB free-throw skill (p = 0.018, ES = 1.17). In contrast, the DL group significantly improved their performance at retention compared to the pre-test in both non-mastered BB (p = 0.004, ES = 1.65) and HB (p = 0.003, ES = 2.15) skills, with a trend (ES = 0.4) towards improvement in the mastered VB test. In both the short-term and relatively long-term, higher composite score gains were observed in DL compared to CI (p = 0.006, ES = 1.11 and 0.049, ES = 1.01) and CO (p = 0.001, ES = 1.73 and <0.0001, ES = 2.67). In conclusion, the present findings provide additional support for the potential advantages of the DL model over those of CI. These findings can serve as the basis for tailored training and intervention strategies and provide a new perspective for addressing various issues related to individual and situational learning.

Implicit Versus Explicit Learning a Novel Skill for High School Students

An Experimental Study on the Performance of Motor Skills Acquired Implicitly under Pressure

A Review of Effects of Explicit Knowledge on Implicit Motor Learning

Implicit learning provides advantage over explicit learning for gait-cognitive dual-task interference

Implicit and explicit learning: applications from basic research to sports for individuals with impaired movement dynamics

Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review

Does Dyadic Practice Interfere with the Type of Motor Learning Promoted by Analogy Instructions?

Successful Transfer of a Motor Learning Strategy to a Novel Sport

Resonance Effects in Variable Practice for Handball, Basketball, and Volleyball Skills: A Study on Contextual Interference and Differential Learning

Discovery learning in sports: Implicit or explicit processes?

Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning

"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.

Default mode and motor networks facilitate early learning of implicit motor sequences: a multimodal MR spectroscopy and fMRI study

Implicit Adaptation is Fast, Robust and Independent from Explicit Adaptation

Effects of an implicit-explicit hybrid learning model on handball tactical knowledge

Study of the synergistic effect of analogical and explicit learning in beginning junior tennis players

Not fleeting but lasting: Limited influence of aging on implicit adaptative motor learning and its short-term retention

Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill's execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?

Implicit Learning, Bilingualism, and Dyslexia: Insights From a Study Assessing AGL With a Modified Simon Task

Implicit learning of regularities followed by realistic body movements in virtual reality

A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation