Open versus endoscopic surgery with helmet molding therapy in non-syndromic patients with craniosynostosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment-related costs

Omar R. Ortega-Ruiz,Mauricio Torres-Martínez,Mariana Villafranca-Cantú,Rebeca Alejandra Ávila-Cañedo,Emilio Piñeyro-Cantú,Eduardo Menchaca-Welsh,Nir Shimony,George I. Jallo,Javier Terrazo-Lluch,J. Javier Cuéllar-Hernández
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06692-2
2024-12-17
Child s Nervous System
Abstract:There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal treatment for craniosynostosis as diverse factors influence the election between endoscopic and open surgery. Previous evidence favors endoscopic procedures. However, evidence remains unfulfilled by a limited number of patients and clustered in very few centers worldwide making it difficult to define it as a replicable technique in different populations. In recent years, evidence regarding endoscopic-assisted procedures has gone through a considerable spurt showing an increased interest among surgeons globally showing optimal outcomes in different populations and centers. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we performed an updated analysis of previous reviews, including only non-syndromic patients. We also seek to provide a summary of the tendency of treatment observed in the literature. Similarly, this is the first study to include total costs within its analysis.
pediatrics,surgery,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?