Abstract:Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. 3 Mansour and colleagues 4 reflect on the potential role of liquid biopsy for the early detection and monitoring of breast cancers and in addressing the global burden of breast cancer. While mammography remains the most widely used screening tool, the authors highlight the potential of emerging blood-based tests to offer a non-invasive, accessible, and potentially more accurate alternative. However, the authors acknowledge that the development and integration of these tests into clinical practice will require significant investment, collaboration with regulatory bodies, and endorsements from reputable organizations to ensure they meet quality and safety standards. Despite these challenges, the authors point to the rapidly expanding market for in vitro diagnostic testing for breast cancer, particularly in regions with high incidence and mortality rates, which presents a substantial economic opportunity. Beyond the economic implications, the widespread adoption of these innovative tests could revolutionize breast cancer screening and diagnosis, ultimately improving quality of life and saving lives on a global scale.The potential of HPV circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to serve as a biomarker for managing HPVpositive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC), particularly in rural populations facing significant barriers to cancer care, is examined in the paper by Windon and Haring. 5 While the data supporting HPV ctDNA's sensitivity in detecting recurrence is favorable, the authors underscore the need for further research to optimize its clinical use. Challenges such as the need for reliable methods to confirm recurrence, the occasional absence of detectable ctDNA in some patients, and the reliance on conventional surveillance methods in cases of false negatives, are crucial issues that remain to be addressed. Despite these limitations, the development of HPV ctDNA assays represents a significant advancement, offering the potential to improve access to care through less invasive diagnostic and surveillance methods. This is particularly impactful for rural populations, where such advancements could enhance cancer-related health equity by making comprehensive surveillance more accessible and potentially reducing the need for frequent in-person exams and imaging.The remaining 2 papers focus on multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests, which are an area of active research for many programs. While standard cancer screening methods have been effective in reducing morbidity and mortality for certain cancers, their reach and effectiveness are limited, especially among underserved populations. MCED tests offer a promising alternative, capable of detecting a broader range of cancers with a simple blood test, which could significantly improve adherence to screening. At present, a number of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of MCED tests are underway, and the paper by Thompson, Buchanan, Myers and Weinberg highlights key steps that should be taken to ensure that MCED clinical trials successfully engage and include participants from diverse populations. 6 Their paper emphasizes the importance of equitable distribution and representation in clinical trials, advocating for the inclusion of diverse populations in research to ensure that the benefits of these emerging technologies are accessible to all. It also highlights the potential of community health workers (CHWs) and health system learning communities as pivotal strategies for engaging underrepresented groups in MCED trials, thereby contributing to the broader goal of reducing cancer disparities and improving public health outcomes.Thompson and Baskin expand these ideas further, by discussing how multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests can fulfill their potential to reduce cancer disparities without exacerbating existing inequalities. 7 The authors emphasize the importance of including diverse populations in clinical trials to ensure that MCED tests are effective across all demographic groups, particularly those who are most affected by cancer disparities. They also highlight key challenges, such as the affordability of MCED tests, the need to build trust in marginalized communities, and the importance of high-test specificity to avoid unnecessary follow-ups. The paper underscores the necessity of patient navigation programs to guide individuals through the healthcare system, especially in underserved populations. By addressing these complex factors early in the development and implementation of MCED tests, the authors argue that these tools can be leveraged to close gaps in cancer screening and improve outcomes for historically marginalized groups. Their call for further research and careful implementation is crucial for ensuring that the benefits of MCED testing are equitably distributed, ultimately contributing to a more just and effective -Abstract Truncated-

Diversifying editorial boards to mitigate the global burden of genitourinary cancers

Diversity among editorial boards of genitourinary oncology journals.

Abstract 1288: Evaluating gender and country of origin diversity on editorial boards in thoracic, gastrointestinal, and breast oncology journals

Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion on Editorial Boards of Medical Student Journals

S2179 Gender and Regional Disparities in Editorial Board Composition of Leading Gastroenterology and Hepatology Journals: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Global Workforce and Access: Demand, Education, Quality

A Global Approach to Improving Penile Cancer Care

Gender and Geographical Representation on Editorial Board Members of Medical Informatics Journals

Growing the global cancer care system: success stories from around the world and lessons for the future

Regional variation in identified cancer care needs of early-career oncologists in China, India, and Pakistan

Editorial diversity correlates with journal impact factor and author diversity in cardiothoracic surgery

Assessing Drivers of Gender Balance and Racial Makeup of Editorial Board Members in Biomedical Engineering

Disparities in Global Authorship and Data Source in the Pediatric Blood and Cancer Journal 2011–2021: Realities and Strategies for Improvement

Overcoming barriers in cancer care for gender minorities

A review of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts by medical oncology journals.

Editorial: Revolutionizing cancer care: the promise of liquid biopsy assays for healthcare equity

Time to Reimagine Equity in Knowledge Generation

Racial Diversity in Cancer Models: A Call to Action for Nanomedicine Researchers

344 The World Neurosurgery Global Champions Program: First-year Experience of a Model Initiative for Reducing Disparities in Global Neurosurgical Literature

Gender Distribution of Editorial Board Members in Palliative Care Journals: Assessment of Gender Parity