Diuretics in pregnancy: Data from the ESC Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC)
Johanna A. van der Zande,Matthias Greutmann,Daniel Tobler,Karishma P. Ramlakhan,Jerome M. J. Cornette,Magalie Ladouceur,Nicholas Collins,Dawn Adamson,Vijaya P. Paruchuri,Roger Hall,Mark R. Johnson,Jolien W. Roos‐Hesselink,on behalf of the ROPAC Investigators Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3301
2024-06-05
European Journal of Heart Failure
Abstract:Outcomes of the Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC) regarding diuretic use during pregnancy. Data in n (%) unless otherwise specified. CI, confidence interval; LMIC, low‐or‐middle‐income country; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE, major adverse cardiac event (combined endpoint of maternal mortality, heart failure, arrhythmia, endocarditis, thromboembolic event and dissection); mWHO, modified World Health Organization; NYHA, New York Health Association; OR, odds ratio. *p 35 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–2.0), other cardiac medication use (OR 5.4, 95% CI 4.2–6.9), signs of heart failure (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–2.2), estimated left ventricular ejection fraction II (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.3–5.1), valvular heart disease (OR 6.3, 95% CI 4.7–8.3) and cardiomyopathy (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.6–5.7) were associated with diuretic use during pregnancy. In multivariable analysis, diuretic use during the first trimester was not significantly associated with foetal or neonatal congenital anomalies (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7–2.6), and diuretic use during pregnancy was also not significantly associated with small for gestational age (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.9). Conclusions Our study does not conclusively establish an association between diuretic use during pregnancy and adverse foetal outcomes. Given these findings, it is essential to assess the risk–benefit ratio on an individual basis to guide clinical decisions.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems