Abstract:The aim was to assess the achievement by self-determined goals in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) participants receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared to vaginal pessary. Forty participants with POP stage II to III were randomly allocated to pessary or PFMT. Participants were asked to list up 3 goals they expected from treatment. Thai version of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR) were completed at 0 and 6-week period. At 6-week post-treatment, they were asked if their goals had been achieved. The totally achieved goals in the vaginal pessary group were 70% (14/20) significantly higher than PFMT group at 30% (6/20) ( p = 0.01). The mean ± SD of the post-treatment P-QOL score in the vaginal pessary group was significantly lower than the PFMT group (13.90 ± 10.83 vs 22.04 ± 5.93, p = 0.01), but not different in all PISQ-IR subscales. Pessary treatment for POP yielded better total goal achievements and better quality of life than PFMT for POP treatment at a 6-week follow-up. What is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can severely affect the quality of life, causing physical, social, psychological, occupational, and/or sexual dysfunction. Individual patient goal setting and goal achievement scaling (GAS) offers a new method of patient-reported outcome measurement (PRO) in therapeutic success such as pessary or surgery in patient with POP. But there is no randomised controlled trial comparing pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) using GAS as the outcome measurement. What do the results of this study add? The results showed that women with POP stage II to III who received vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than the women received the PFMT at 6-week follow up. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The information about the better goal achievements by using pessary can be used as the tools for counselling for patients with POP for selecting the choices for the treatment in the clinical setting. POP stage II to III patients treatedwith vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than treated by PFMT.

Outcomes in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Presenting With Pessary-Related Complications

Pessary with perineal suture for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: description and benefit of the technique

Pessary or surgery for a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: the PEOPLE study, a multicentre prospective cohort study

Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function

Vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: A survey among french gynecological surgeons

Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women

Use of Silicon Vaginal Pessary for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

A Multidisciplinary Approach for Treating Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Pregnancy: A Series of Eight Women

Cost-effectiveness of pessary therapy versus surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised non-inferiority controlled trial

Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?

Clinical Study on Silicone Pessary in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years

ESTROgen use for complications in women treating pelvic organ prolapse with vaginal PESSaries (ESTRO-PESS)—a randomized clinical trial

The unmet needs in vaginal pessaries

Silicone pessary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse: Women's experiences of Accessing Care & Recommendations for improvement

Patient-reported goal achievements after pelvic floor muscle training versus pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse. A randomised controlled trial

Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women’s treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse

Silicone Irregular Hexagon Pessary Versus Polyvinyl Chloride Ring Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Randomised Controlled Trial

[Factors Influencing Therapy Decision in Patients with Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse].

Nonoperative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse