Health risks of inhaled selected toxic elements during the haze episodes in Shijiazhuang, China: Insight into critical risk sources

Liuli Diao,Huitao Zhang,Baoshuang Liu,Chunling Dai,Yufen Zhang,Qili Dai,Xiaohui Bi,Lingzhi Zhang,Congbo Song,Yinchang Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116664
IF: 8.9
2021-05-01
Environmental Pollution
Abstract:<p>PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Shijiazhuang was collected from 15 October 2018 to 31 January 2019, and selected toxic elements were measured. Five typical haze episodes were chosen to analyze the health risks and critical risk sources. Toxic elements during the haze episodes accounted for 0.33% of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass. Non-cancer risk of toxic elements for children was 1.8 times higher than that for adults during the haze episodes, while cancer risk for adults was 2.5 times higher than that for children; cancer and non-cancer risks were primarily attributable to As and Mn, respectively. Health risks of toxic elements increased during the growth and stable periods of haze episodes. Non-cancer and cancer risks of toxic elements during the haze stable periods were higher than other haze stages, and higher for children than for adults during the stable period. Mn was the largest contributor to non-cancer risk during different haze stages, while As was the largest contributor to cancer risk. Crustal dust, vehicle emissions, and industrial emissions were critical sources of cancer risk during the clean-air periods; while vehicle emissions, coal combustion, and crustal dust were key sources of cancer risk during the haze episodes. Cancer risks of crustal dust and vehicle emissions during the haze episodes were 2.0 and 1.7 times higher than those in the clean-air periods. Non-cancer risks from emission sources were not found during different periods. Cancer risks due to biomass burning and coal combustion increased rapidly during the haze growth period, while that of coal combustion decreased sharply during the dissipation period. Vehicle emissions, crustal dust, and coal combustion were significant cancer risk sources during different haze stages, cancer risk of each source was the highest during the stable period. Southern Hebei and Northern Anhui were potential risk regions that affected the health of both adults and children in Shijiazhuang.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the health risks of inhaling selected toxic elements during the haze in Shijiazhuang, China, especially identifying the key risk sources. Specifically, the research focuses on the following points: 1. **Health Risk Assessment**: By analyzing the concentrations of selected toxic elements in PM2.5 during the haze, assess the health risks of these elements to adults and children, including non - cancer risks and cancer risks. 2. **Identification of Key Risk Sources**: Combine health risk assessment and positive matrix factorization (PMF) method to identify the key health risk sources at different stages during the haze. 3. **Risk Differences among Different Populations**: Compare the differences in health risks between adults and children during the haze, especially the differences in non - cancer risks and cancer risks. 4. **Temporal Evolution Analysis**: Analyze the changes in health risks during different stages of haze occurrence (growth period, stable period, dissipation period) to understand the changes in key risk sources on a finer time scale. ### Research Background - **Haze Problem**: Haze occurs frequently in winter in North China, especially in high - population - density cities like Shijiazhuang. - **Health Effects**: Toxic elements in PM2.5 can enter the human body through respiration, leading to health problems such as arteriosclerosis, hypertension, heart disease and cancer. - **Deficiencies in Existing Research**: Although previous studies have evaluated health risks during and outside of haze periods, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis of key risk sources, which is not conducive to controlling risk sources. ### Research Methods - **Sampling and Chemical Analysis**: From October 15, 2018 to January 31, 2019, PM2.5 samples were simultaneously collected at five locations in Shijiazhuang and chemically analyzed. - **Health Risk Assessment**: Use indicators such as lifetime average daily dose (LADD), hazard quotient (HQ) and cancer risk (R) to assess health risks. - **PMF Method**: Use the positive matrix factorization (PMF) method to identify the contributions of different sources to toxic elements. ### Main Findings - **Health Risks**: During the haze, the non - cancer risks and cancer risks of both adults and children increased significantly. In particular, arsenic (As) contributed the most to cancer risks, while manganese (Mn) contributed the most to non - cancer risks. - **Key Risk Sources**: Crustal dust, vehicle emissions and industrial emissions are the main cancer risk sources during clean air periods; during the haze, vehicle emissions, coal combustion and crustal dust become the main cancer risk sources. - **Risk Changes at Different Stages**: During the growth and stable periods of the haze, health risks increased significantly. Especially in the stable period, the non - cancer risks and cancer risks of children were higher than those of adults. ### Conclusion This study provides a scientific basis for formulating targeted pollution control measures through detailed health risk assessment and identification of key risk sources. In particular, specific prevention and control suggestions are proposed for high - risk areas in Shijiazhuang and its surrounding areas.