Abstract:Researchers often estimate the association between the hazard of a time‐to‐event outcome and the characteristics of individuals and the clusters in which individuals are nested. Lin and Wei's robust variance estimator is often used with a Cox regression model fit to clustered data. Recently, alternative variance estimators have been proposed: the Fay–Graubard estimator, the Kauermann–Carroll estimator, and the Mancl–DeRouen estimator. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we found that, when fitting a marginal Cox regression model with both individual‐level and cluster‐level covariates: (i) in the presence of weak to moderate within‐cluster homogeneity of outcomes, the Lin–Wei variance estimator can result in estimates of the SE with moderate bias when the number of clusters is fewer than 20–30, while in the presence of strong within‐cluster homogeneity, it can result in biased estimation even when the number of clusters is as large as 100; (ii) when the number of clusters was less than approximately 20, the Fay–Graubard variance estimator tended to result in estimates of SE with the lowest bias; (iii) when the number of clusters exceeded approximately 20, the Mancl–DeRouen estimator tended to result in estimated standard errors with the lowest bias; (iv) the Mancl–DeRouen estimator used with a t‐distribution tended to result in 95% confidence that had the best performance of the estimators; (v) when the magnitude of within‐cluster homogeneity in outcomes was strong or very strong, all methods resulted in confidence intervals with lower than advertised coverage rates even when the number of clusters was very large.

Small sample considerations in estimation from panel data

Panel data models with nonadditive unobserved heterogeneity: Estimation and inference

Sample Size Estimation for Random-effects Models: Balancing Precision and Feasibility in Panel Studies

Two-Way Cluster-Robust Standard Errors—A Methodological Note on What Has Been Done and What Has Not Been Done in Accounting and Finance Research

Fixed-b Asymptotics for Panel Models with Two-Way Clustering

Entrywise Inference for Missing Panel Data: A Simple and Instance-Optimal Approach

Neglected dynamics and spatial dependence on panel data: consequences for convergence of the usual static model estimators

Fixed-b Estimation and Inference in Heterogenous Dynamic Cointegrated Panels

Estimation in Partially Linear Single-Index Panel Data Models With Fixed Effects

Nonseparable panel models with index structure and correlated random effects

Inference In Partially Identified Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects

Estimation and Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Fixed-Effects Panel Data Partially Linear Models

The effect of number of clusters and magnitude of within‐cluster homogeneity in outcomes on the performance of four variance estimators for a marginal multivariable Cox regression model fit to clustered data in the context of observational research

Limitations of Fixed-Effects Models for Panel Data

Initial Conditions of Dynamic Panel Data Models: on Within and Between Equations

E¢ cient GMM estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with xed e¤ects

Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimators for Spatial Dynamic Panel Data with Fixed Effects when Both N and T Are Large

Spatial panels : random components vs . xed e ¤ ects Lung

Efficient GMM estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with fixed effects

Uniform Inference in Linear Panel Data Models with Two-Dimensional Heterogeneity?

Efficient estimation of true fixed-effects stochastic frontier models