An integrated regional prioritisation framework for seismic and energy-efficiency performance upgrading of residential buildings
Gianrocco Mucedero,Ricardo Monteiro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104341
IF: 4.842
2024-02-21
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Abstract:Given the ambitious carbon emission reduction targets, enormous resources are being invested in Europe to foster environmental, economic and social sustainability. An urgent response, foreseen by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, is also demanded by the European Commission to all the Member States for the energy requalification of buildings, which are responsible for about 36% of European greenhouse gas emissions. While targeting energy efficiency improvement, many regions are prone to other perils, such as seismic hazard, which might compromise the effective sustainability of the energy requalification. In fact, the innate diversity between regions or countries, which do not share the same seismic risk level and social issues, cannot be overlooked. For this reason, specific indicators should be considered to achieve an appropriate level of resilience (energy, seismic and social) of the overall existing building stock. This paper proposes an integrated framework, specifically calibrated and demonstrated for the Italian residential building stock, applicable to any other region or country, based on primary indicators defined for regional assessment. The framework encompasses single and multi-sectoral indicators, providing different prioritisation patterns and refinement scales, from province to national level. The most updated building fragility models are selected and combined through a logic tree strategy. The space heating energy consumption and CO 2 emissions are directly taken from a collection of all the Energy Performance Certificates (APE) of Italian buildings and building units, while national and European indices are used to account for socioeconomic aspects. In addition to the socioeconomic aspects related to the development levels of each region, energy poverty and earthquake risk awareness were also considered as indicators of the socioeconomic vulnerability of regions. The proposed framework and the prioritisation patterns obtained in this work can support relevant stakeholders to foresee economic support and strategic financial planning for seismic strengthening and energy renovation interventions on existing buildings, including socioeconomic features, and favour funding in regions of higher needs.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources