Marizomib for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase 3 trial

Patrick Roth,Thierry Gorlia,Jaap C Reijneveld,Filip de Vos,Ahmed Idbaih,Jean-Sébastien Frenel,Emilie Le Rhun,Juan Manuel Sepulveda,James Perry,G Laura Masucci,Pierre Freres,Hal Hirte,Clemens Seidel,Annemiek Walenkamp,Slavka Lukacova,Paul Meijnders,Andre Blais,Francois Ducray,Vincent Verschaeve,Garth Nicholas,Carmen Balana,Daniela A Bota,Matthias Preusser,Sarah Nuyens,Fréderic Dhermain,Martin van den Bent,Chris J O’Callaghan,Maureen Vanlancker,Warren Mason,Michael Weller,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae053
2024-03-19
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:Abstract Background Standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The proteasome has long been considered a promising therapeutic target because of its role as a central biological hub in tumor cells. Marizomib is a novel pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier. Methods EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase 3 superiority trial. Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age > 18 years and Karnofsky performance status > 70. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ with patients receiving only standard treatment in the whole population, and in the subgroup of patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors. Results The trial was opened at 82 institutions in Europe, Canada and the US. A total of 749 patients (99.9% of planned 750) were randomized. OS was not different between the standard and the marizomib arm (median 17 vs 16.5 months; HR=1.04; p=0.64). PFS was not statistically different either (median 6.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR=0.97; p=0.67). In patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors, OS was also not different between standard therapy and marizomib (median 14.5 vs 15.1 months, HR=1.13; p=0.27). More CTCAE grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the marizomib arm than in the standard arm. Conclusions Adding marizomib to standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy resulted in more toxicity, but did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
oncology,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?