Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration
Philippe Ciais,Yitong Yao,Thomas Gasser,Alessandro Baccini,Yilong Wang,Ronny Lauerwald,Shushi Peng,Ana Bastos,Wei Li,Peter A Raymond,Josep G Canadell,Glen P Peters,Rob J Andres,Jinfeng Chang,Chao Yue,A Johannes Dolman,Vanessa Haverd,Jens Hartmann,Goulven Laruelle,Alexandra G Konings,Anthony W King,Yi Liu,Sebastiaan Luyssaert,Fabienne Maignan,Prabir K Patra,Anna Peregon,Pierre Regnier,Julia Pongratz,Benjamin Poulter,Anatoly Shvidenko,Riccardo Valentini,Rong Wang,Grégoire Broquet,Yi Yin,Jakob Zscheischler,Bertrand Guenet,Daniel S Goll,Ashley-P Ballantyne,Hui Yang,Chunjing Qiu,Dan Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa145
IF: 20.6
2020-07-07
National Science Review
Abstract:Abstract Resolving regional carbon budgets is critical for informing land-based mitigation policy. For nine regions covering nearly the whole globe, we collected inventory estimates of carbon-stock changes complemented by satellite estimates of biomass changes where inventory data are missing. The net land–atmospheric carbon exchange (NEE) was calculated by taking the sum of the carbon-stock change and lateral carbon fluxes from crop and wood trade, and riverine-carbon export to the ocean. Summing up NEE from all regions, we obtained a global ‘bottom-up’ NEE for net land anthropogenic CO2 uptake of –2.2 ± 0.6 PgC yr−1 consistent with the independent top-down NEE from the global atmospheric carbon budget during 2000–2009. This estimate is so far the most comprehensive global bottom-up carbon budget accounting, which set up an important milestone for global carbon-cycle studies. By decomposing NEE into component fluxes, we found that global soil heterotrophic respiration amounts to a source of CO2 of 39 PgC yr−1 with an interquartile of 33–46 PgC yr−1—a much smaller portion of net primary productivity than previously reported.
multidisciplinary sciences