P039 A systematic review and meta analysis of anti rheumatic drugs and pneumococcal vaccine immunogenicity in inflammatory arthritis

Deepak Nagra,Katie Bechman,Maryam Adas,Zijing Yang,Edward Alveyn,Samir Patel,Mark Russell,Sam Norton,Chris Wincup,Christopher Baldwin,James Galloway
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae163.081
2024-04-01
Rheumatology
Abstract:Abstract Background/Aims Pneumococcal pneumonia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality amongst patients with inflammatory arthritis. Vaccination is recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) but it remains unclear how vaccine efficacy is impacted by different immunosuppressive agents. Our objective was to compare the chance of a seroconversion following vaccination against pneumococcus in patients with inflammatory arthritis to the general population as well as to compare the chance of seroconversion across different targeted therapies. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library databases from inception until 20th June 2023. We included randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Aggregate data were used to undertake pairwise meta-analysis. Our primary outcome of interest was vaccine seroconversion. We accepted the definition of serological response reported by the authors of each study. Results 20 studies identified in the systematic review (2,807 patients) with 10 reporting sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis (1,443 patients). The odds of seroconversion in patients receiving targeted therapies, relative to the general population, was 0.61 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.08). The reduced odds of response was skewed strongly by the effects of abatacept and rituximab with no difference between patients on TNF inhibitors or IL6 inhibition and healthy controls. In the analysis comparing within inflammatory arthritis populations the findings remained consistent with rituximab having the strongest negative impact on vaccine response. TNF inhibition monotherapy associated with a greater odds of vaccine response compared with methotrexate (2.25 (95% CI 1.28 to 3.96)). JAK inhibitor studies were few in number and did not present comparable vaccine response endpoints to include in meta-analysis. The information available does not suggest a significant detrimental effects of JAK inhibitor on vaccine response. Conclusion This updated meta-analysis confirms that for the majority of patients with inflammatory arthritis, pneumococcal vaccine can be administered with confidence that it will achieve comparable seroconversion rates to the healthy population. Patients on rituximab were the group least likely to achieve a response and further research is needed to explore the value of multiple course pneumococcal vaccination schedules in this population. Disclosure D. Nagra: Honoraria; Abbvie, Galapagos, UCB. K. Bechman: None. M. Adas: None. Z. yang: None. E. Alveyn: None. S. Patel: None. M. Russell: None. S. Norton: None. C. Wincup: None. C. Baldwin: None. J. Galloway: None.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to evaluate the application of existing Social Engagement (SE) measurement tools in patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMDs). Specifically, the research objectives include: 1. **Identify the impact of RMDs on social engagement**: - Identify the key impacts of RMDs and their treatments on social engagement through a systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative literature. - Identify the barriers and facilitators among these impacts. 2. **Evaluate existing SE measurement tools**: - Identify SE measurement tools validated in patients with RMDs through a systematic review of quantitative literature. - Compare the constructs of these measurement tools with the themes identified in the qualitative analysis. 3. **Highlight the need for new SE measurement tools**: - Existing SE measurement tools fail to comprehensively assess various impacts that patients consider important. - Plan to conduct focus group discussions involving RMDs patients and key stakeholders to help develop new SE measurement tools, thereby improving health and social outcomes. ### Main findings - **Qualitative analysis**: - Barriers include: direct impacts of RMDs, practical difficulties in participating in social activities, and changes in social networks and roles. - Facilitators include: benefits of social participation, resilience and acceptance, and activity adjustment. - **Quantitative analysis**: - 15 specific SE measurement tools were screened from 7,772 records. These tools mainly measure the frequency, satisfaction, difficulty, and adjustment of social participation. ### Conclusion Existing SE measurement tools fail to comprehensively assess various impacts that RMDs patients consider important. Therefore, new SE measurement tools need to be developed to better support interventions and improve the health and social outcomes of RMDs patients.