Abstract:Recently, deep learning-based image inpainting methods have made great strides in reconstructing damaged regions. However, these methods often struggle to produce satisfactory results when dealing with missing images with large holes, leading to distortions in the structure and blurring of textures. To address these problems, we combine the advantages of transformers and convolutions to propose an image inpainting method that incorporates edge priors and attention mechanisms. The proposed method aims to improve the results of inpainting large holes in images by enhancing the accuracy of structure restoration and the ability to recover texture details. This method divides the inpainting task into two phases: edge prediction and image inpainting. Specifically, in the edge prediction phase, a transformer architecture is designed to combine axial attention with standard self-attention. This design enhances the extraction capability of global structural features and location awareness. It also balances the complexity of self-attention operations, resulting in accurate prediction of the edge structure in the defective region. In the image inpainting phase, a multi-scale fusion attention module is introduced. This module makes full use of multi-level distant features and enhances local pixel continuity, thereby significantly improving the quality of image inpainting. To evaluate the performance of our method, comparative experiments are conducted on several datasets, including CelebA, Places2, and Facade. Quantitative experiments show that our method outperforms the other mainstream methods. Specifically, it improves Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structure Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) by 1.141~3.234 db and 0.083~0.235, respectively. Moreover, it reduces Learning Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) by 0.0347~0.1753 and 0.0104~0.0402, respectively. Qualitative experiments reveal that our method excels at reconstructing images with complete structural information and clear texture details. Furthermore, our model exhibits impressive performance in terms of the number of parameters, memory cost, and testing time.

Reference-Guided Landmark Image Inpainting With Deep Feature Matching

Image Inpainting Based on Gradient Weighted Patch Propagation and Color Rectification

Non-Local Image Inpainting Using Low-Rank Matrix Completion: Non-Local Image Inpainting Using Low-Rank Matrix Completion

Reference Image-Assisted Auxiliary Feature Fusion in Image Inpainting

Reference-guided face inpainting with reference attention network

The Improved Image Inpainting Algorithm Via Encoder and Similarity Constraint

Image Inpainting Based on Interactive Separation Network and Progressive Reconstruction Algorithm

Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting Using Structure Consistent Patch Matching

Structure-Guided Image Inpainting Using Homography Transformation

Reference-Guided Large-Scale Face Inpainting with Identity and Texture Control

Diverse Image Inpainting with Disentangled Uncertainty

Image Inpainting Technique Incorporating Edge Prior and Attention Mechanism

Art Image Inpainting with Style-guided Dual-branch Inpainting Network

Reference Guided Image Inpainting using Facial Attributes

LaFIn: Generative Landmark Guided Face Inpainting

Reference-based Painterly Inpainting via Diffusion: Crossing the Wild Reference Domain Gap

Assessing Image Inpainting Via Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation

GeoFill: Reference-Based Image Inpainting with Better Geometric Understanding

Deep Blind Image Inpainting

Collaborative Contrastive Learning-Based Generative Model for Image Inpainting

Image inpainting via progressive decoder and gradient guidance