Abstract:BACKGROUND: There are several methods to read skin prick test results in type-I allergy testing. A commonly used method is to characterize the wheal size by its 'average diameter'. A more accurate method is to scan the area of the wheal to calculate the actual size. In both methods, skin prick test (SPT) results can be corrected for histamine-sensitivity of the skin by dividing the results of the allergic reaction by the histamine control. The objectives of this study are to compare different techniques of quantifying SPT results, to determine a cut-off value for a positive SPT for histamine equivalent prick -index (HEP) area, and to study the accuracy of predicting cashew nut reactions in double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) tests with the different SPT methods.METHODS: Data of 172 children with cashew nut sensitisation were used for the analysis. All patients underwent a DBPCFC with cashew nut. Per patient, the average diameter and scanned area of the wheal size were recorded. In addition, the same data for the histamine-induced wheal were collected for each patient. The accuracy in predicting the outcome of the DBPCFC using four different SPT readings (i.e. average diameter, area, HEP-index diameter, HEP-index area) were compared in a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) plot.RESULTS: Characterizing the wheal size by the average diameter method is inaccurate compared to scanning method. A wheal average diameter of 3 mm is generally considered as a positive SPT cut-off value and an equivalent HEP-index area cut-off value of 0.4 was calculated. The four SPT methods yielded a comparable area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84, 0.85, 0.83 and 0.83, respectively. The four methods showed comparable accuracy in predicting cashew nut reactions in a DBPCFC.CONCLUSIONS: The 'scanned area method' is theoretically more accurate in determining the wheal area than the 'average diameter method' and is recommended in academic research. A HEP-index area of 0.4 is determined as cut-off value for a positive SPT. However, in clinical practice, the 'average diameter method' is also useful, because this method provides similar accuracy in predicting cashew nut allergic reactions in the DBPCFC.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial number NTR3572.

Diagnosing peanut allergy with skin prick and specific IgE testing

The diagnostic value of skin prick testing in children with food allergy

The predictive value of skin prick testing for challenge-proven food allergy: a systematic review

Predictive value of peanut skin prick test, specific IgE in peanut-sensitized children in Singapore

Predicting reactivity threshold in children with anaphylaxis to peanut

The Natural History of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy: Can Skin Prick Tests and Serum-Specific IgE Predict the Resolution of Food Allergy?

Does skin prick test reactivity to purified allergens correlate with clinical severity of peanut allergy?

Peanut allergy in relation to heredity, maternal diet, and other atopic diseases: results of a questionnaire survey, skin prick testing, and food challenges

Skin Prick Test Predictive Values for the Outcome of Cashew Challenges in Children

Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results

Epitope-Specific IgE at 1 Year of Age Can Predict Peanut Allergy Status at 5 Years

Comparison of results of skin tests, RAST, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis

Can we predict severe reactions during peanut challenges in children?

Is Component-Specific Antibody Testing Sufficient to Replace the Oral Food Challenge in the Diagnostics of Peanut-Sensitized Children? A Proof-of-Concept Study

Diagnostic usefulness of component-resolved diagnosis by skin prick tests and specific IgE to single allergen components in children with allergy to fruits and vegetables

Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years

Successful introduction of peanut in sensitized infants with reported reactions at home

Cut-Off Values of Specific IgE and Skin Prick Test to Predict Oral Food Challenge Positivity in Children with Cow’s Milk Allergy

Serologic Measurements for Peanut Allergy: Predicting Clinical Severity is Complex

Basophil activation test discriminates between allergy and tolerance in peanut-sensitized children