Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in adult patients received elective surgeries: a meta‐analysis

Dilireba Ainiwaer,Wanwei Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02479-9

IF: 2.376

2024-03-08

BMC Anesthesiology

Abstract:Propofol is use widely used in anesthesia, known for its effectiveness, may lead to cardiopulmonary issues in some patients. Ciprofol has emerged as a possible alternative to propofol because it can achieve comparable effects to propofol while causing fewer adverse events at lower doses. However, no definitive conclusion has been reached yet. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia.

anesthesiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main aim of this paper is to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel anesthetic Ciprofol (HSK3486) with the traditional anesthetic Propofol in general anesthesia for elective surgery in adults through a meta-analysis.

### Research Background
- Propofol is a widely used anesthetic, although it is effective, it may cause cardiopulmonary issues in some patients.
- Ciprofol, as a potential alternative, can achieve similar effects to Propofol at lower doses and may cause fewer adverse reactions.

### Research Objective
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ciprofol versus Propofol in general anesthesia for elective surgery in adult patients.

### Methods
- Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Ciprofol and Propofol for general anesthesia.
- Efficacy indicators analyzed included the success induction rate, time required for successful induction, time to loss of eyelash reflex, and overall estimated mean of the bispectral index (BIS).
- Safety indicators included time to full awakening, incidence of hypotension, incidence of arrhythmia, and incidence of pain at the injection site.

### Results
- Data from a total of 712 patients from 6 randomized controlled trials were analyzed.
- Meta-analysis indicated that Ciprofol and Propofol were comparable in terms of success induction rate, time required for successful induction, time to loss of eyelash reflex, time to full awakening, and incidence of arrhythmia.
- Ciprofol was superior to Propofol in terms of overall estimated mean of the bispectral index (BIS), incidence of hypotension, and incidence of pain at the injection site.

### Conclusion
- Ciprofol may be a promising alternative to Propofol as it can achieve satisfactory anesthesia depth with fewer incidences of hypotension and pain at the injection site.
- However, given the limited amount of current data, further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.