Abstract:We used structural equation modeling techniques to expand traditional generalizability theory (G-theory) models to allow for congeneric relationships among item responses while accounting for the primary sources of measurement error that affect results from objectively scored, self-report measures. Data came from 919 respondents who completed the Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Openness subscales of the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John et al., <a href="#">1991</a> John, O. P. , Donahue, E. M. , & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54 . University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. <a class="google-scholar" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=1991&author=O.+P.+John&author=E.+M.+Donahue&author=R.+L.+Kentle&title=+The+Big+Five+Inventory+%E2%80%93+Versions+4a+and+54+">[Google Scholar]</a>) on two occasions. When compared to traditional and factor-based essential tau-equivalent G-theory models, congeneric models on average yielded superior fit statistics, higher estimates of reliability, and lower estimates of transient and specific-factor measurement error. Essential tau-equivalent and congeneric factor models also were configured to allow for simultaneous partitioning of systematic and measurement error variance at both total score and individual item levels. We provide detailed guidelines, examples, and computer code in R for all models discussed in an extended online supplement to enable readers to apply the demonstrated techniques.

A Galois-Connection between Cattell's and Szondi's Personality Profiles

A Galois-Connection between Myers-Briggs' Type Indicators and Szondi's Personality Profiles

A Basic Bivariate Structure of Personality Attributes Evident Across Nine Languages

The factor structure of Chinese personality terms.

Measuring the Personality of Chinese: QZPS Versus NEO PI‐R

Computer-Aided Discovery and Categorisation of Personality Axioms

Idiographic Personality Gaussian Process for Psychological Assessment

Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Psychopathology: A Stormy Relationship

High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD.

Cattell’s Personality Factor Questionnaire (CPFQ): Development and Preliminary Study

Is Einstein more agreeable and less neurotic than Hitler? A computational exploration of the emotional and personality profiles of historical persons

The Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire Predicts Functioning Styles of Personality Disorder: A Trial in Healthy Subjects and Personality-Disorder Patients

The five and seven factors personality models: differences and similitude between the TCI-R, NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC

A Comparison of Measures for Assessing Profile Similarity in Dyads

PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection

Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability

Expanding G-Theory Models to Incorporate Congeneric Relationships: Illustrations Using the Big Five Inventory

Convergence of the dimensional assessment of personality pathology (DAPP-BQ) and the five-factor personality inventory for the international classification of diseases 11th edition (FFiCD) in the context of the five-factor model and personality disorders

Personality Profiles of Global Software Developers

Personality Construct Similarity in Israel and the United States

Career Assessment and The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire